In the Same manner that John Bingham disagrees with me. You are simply distorting Madison's point. Madison usage of the word "place" is not a simple geographic boundary. If it were, he would need add nothing to it.
But Madison goes on to explain what he meant by "place." He meant born to a long established family in a long established community, and therefore bound to that community by societal and familial bounds.
You are just leaving out Madison's version of "allegiance to no other sovereign", same as you did with Bingham. You are like a one trick pony in this regard.
I'm not going to bother addressing the rest of your verbiage. I am confident it too is crap.
I'm distorting Madison's point?
I'm not the person arguing that "place" doesn't mean "place."