No, we cannot, for YOU are incapable of doing it. All you can do is to continue to assert you are correct, and that you understand history, and that you understand the law, and that any thing which contradicts your view of your own understanding is WRONG WRONG WRONG.
You are a legend in your own mind, but a reasonable person you are not. I doubt you can put together an argument which is not some form of a fallacy. And when people aren't impressed by that, you lie by omission (and commission I suspect) with a good dose of ad hominem thrown in in an attempt to brow beat.
That's a rather odd statement, coming from someone whose arguments have been repeatedly shown to be fallacy after fallacy, addressed to someone whose argument have not been shown to be fallacious.
And when people aren't impressed by that, you lie by omission (and commission I suspect) with a good dose of ad hominem thrown in in an attempt to brow beat.
That's a rather odd statement, coming from someone who omits the entire record of what early legal authorities said "natural born citizen" meant, and who attempts to paint those who present the historical view, which is agreed upon by every substantial conservative Constitutional organization in existence, and by conservative Constitutional experts like Mark Levin, as a "troll," an "Obot," a "liberal," and worse.