Well Bless your heart.
Do please show me where I said anything about 'staying home from the polls'.
OR where I claimed to be any kind of expert
-----
I'm here for knowledge, Jeff. NOT YOUR interpretation, not YOUR rationalizations, not your unsubstantiated textual assaults where you do nothing more that arrogantly INSTRUCT people in the error of their ways and pompously insult them when they disagree.
Rational debates are a give and take proposition, Jeff, and people here FOR rational debates realize that.
Do please show me where I said anything about 'staying home from the polls'.
Okay. Try this post.
OR where I claimed to be any kind of expert
You've repeatedly and adamantly claimed that the standard, historical understanding of "natural born citizen" is wrong. You have quoted from US v Wong Kim Ark to try and justify that claim.
Those claims go directly against all genuine early legal authority, against actual case law, against the explicit word of authorities like Reagan Supreme Court appointee Sandra Day O'Connor ("All of our Presidents have, to date, been born in the 50 states. Notably, President Obama was born in the state of Hawaii, and so is clearly a natural born citizen."), and against genuine conservative Constitutional authorities such as the Heritage Foundation, National Review, and Mark Levin.
If saying that you know far better than those folks, and attempting to argue from cases such as US v Wong Kim Ark, isn't trying to present yourself as someone who knows better than the genuine experts, I don't know what is.