So everyone should believe you instead of their own lying eyes. Got it.
-----
Let's approach this as a theoretical.
Let's not.
-----
One of those opinions is supported by the Father of the Constitution
Yeah and your source for the quote? Name, House of Representatives and the year.
I'm certain that single sentence are the ONLY words he spoke the entire time.
-----
Which opinion represents the understanding of our early leaders regarding citizenship?
An opinion without context is just a guessing game. I've already told you, I don't play those.
-----
I don't have any idea what you're talking about. Maybe you can steer me a bit better here?
Since it's YOUR link that YOU posted as support of YOUR evidence, YOU figure it out.
-----
It's a question that only has one possible answer, for anyone who is remotely honest.
Remotely honest? That's RICH!
Particularly coming from a fraud
Spin all you like. I'm the person who has presented credible evidence here and asked people to believe not me, but the actual evidence. I think that's pretty clear.
Let's approach this as a theoretical.
Let's not.
Okay. So your response to a suggestion that one go with the opinion of our early leaders, rather than with the opinion of a fringe guy who they said was wrong, is: "I adamantly refuse to accept the opinion of America's early leaders, including the Father of our Constitution, as to what citizenship was about, because I don't want to believe what they said."
That's pretty much what I expected from you at this point.
Yeah and your source for the quote? Name, House of Representatives and the year.
James Madison, Father of the Constitution, House of Representatives in the First Congress, May 1789.
Since it's YOUR link that YOU posted as support of YOUR evidence, YOU figure it out.
Show me which link you refer to, and I'll have a look.
Particularly coming from a fraud
Frauds are those who twist and misrepresent history, not those who present an accurate view of it.