[philman_36]

No, this is about him being foolish enough to leave an opening for somebody in the media to create an issue.
OMG! Such hyperbole!
The "media" would create an issue about a wet spot on the front of someone's pants!
"Confirmed rumors of an unreported bladder control issue in "so and so's" life after public appearance?"
Alternate headline..."People are asking..."Depends or Attends?"

...bottom line is he made it possible by leaving the door wide open.
So he intentionally meant for his statements to be misconstrued.
Got it. Thanks for setting me straight. /sarcasm

[Truthsearcher]

Intentional, of course not. Nobody intends their statement to be misconstrued.

An articulate and thoughtful person though, will speak in a clear way that doesn’t leave room for these types of misconstructions to take place. Is that too much to ask of someone who aspires to be one of 100 people out of 300 million in the country to serve in the United States Senate?