To: SwinneySwitch; GeronL; no dems; DallasBiff; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; ...
It’s interesting that for all his prominence, Ron Paul didn’t have a Libertarian successor waiting in the wings.
2 posted on
05/25/2012 10:38:15 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama and Company lied, the American economy died)
To: Clintonfatigued
for all his prominence, Ron Paul didn’t have a Libertarian successor waitingWait, didn't he run and win as a Republican?
3 posted on
05/25/2012 10:46:22 PM PDT by
no-s
(when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
To: Clintonfatigued
It looks like the Republicans are going to lose a seat in MI due to lack of signatures, but it looks like they will pick up this seat in Texas.
17 posted on
05/26/2012 3:55:47 AM PDT by
John D
To: Clintonfatigued
I thought his other son would run for his father’s seat. Guess not.
20 posted on
05/26/2012 1:18:27 PM PDT by
Mozilla
(Constitution Party 2012)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson