Replies

On the off-chance that maybe you are willing to consider that I just might be telling you the truth about Dewhurst being more conservative than Cruz, because I do know some things you might be unaware of,

Here is a link to some information about the case in question:

http://www.globaltirenews.com/headlines2.html?id=1281627398

One lawyer told me he put Cruz signs out because Dewhurst called attention to Cruz work on behalf of the billion-dollar Chinese company that stole the designs of the small American company, because it upset him that Dewhurst would obliquely remind voters in that ad that we already have a surfeit of Harvard-educated trial lawyers such as Cruz in the U.S. Senate representing the interests of China over that of Americans.

I have no part in the Dewhurst campaign. All I can tell you is I’m a conservative in Texas with some familiarity with Dewhurst and state politics and my conclusion is Dewhurst is more conservative than Cruz, and I think a lot of tea-partiers, a movement I agree with on the issues, have been seduced by out of state interests to think otherwise.

Fine. You did not work on the ad campaign, yet you know more detail about the ad, then someone who just saw it a few times. Perhaps you can answer some questions ?

What time period did Cruz work for the Chinese Firm ?
What exactly did Cruz do for them ?
When was the Chinese firm found guilty of stealing secrets and intellectual knowledge ?
Is Cruz still working for the Chinsese firm ?
Did he take the Chinese work on his own volition or was he required to work for them because of a firm Cruz worked at ?
What work did Cruz perform that directly related to the case of intellectual theft ?

Until all those questions are answered, ad as played is dirty tricks.

And BTW - You wont sway Freepers with insults. It says more about you, then the people you insult. And that my friend, is some kind advice.