I wish that we didn’t lean on the “added scriptures are false” argument. The verses in the bible talk about adding to the individual books that those verses are in.
How about the BOM is false because there is not one atom of evidence to prove its validity. We look like dopes when we use weak arguments to prove obvious facts.
I hope that everyone heard that. THE BOM IS NOT FALSE BECAUSE ITS ADDED SCRIPTURE, ITS FALSE BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ONE ATOM OF EVIDENCE FOR IT. It is beyond ridiclous for people to believe something with so many falshoods printed in it.
Of couse the BOM sounds biblical, it has plagarized verses from the KJV in it. Somehow God spoke the Kings english whish is convenient if you want people in 1830 to believe something is bibilical. Joseph Smith is a con thus saith the Lord.
You could argue that any tracts that are passed out are added scripture cause they contain more than just verses.
Agreed, but let me add a few more...
How about false prophecies? JS and others are guilty of such. Right there is an automatic Biblical disqualification. Anything they ever uttered, wrote, did, etc. is not of God.
So-called prophets claiming to have “proof” that God and Jesus have inherited their wives?
Baptizing the dead so that they can have a “second chance”?
Jesus destroying cities and massacring millions upon His resurrection so He could “save”?
The requirements to take out temple endowments, promise to engage in celestial polygamous sex in order to populate the planet you become a god of, etc., etc.