You state: “I’m not a Paul supporter, but everything in the add is true.”
...sliming half truths. Tells more about Paul than Gingrich. Totally disgusting individual.
For example - Of these scheighty eight ethics charges - how many was he found guilt of? You MUST know if you can pontifically pronounce Paul’s charges all true, right?
Let me refresh your memory, tho’, just in case.
After 3 years of feverish digging, they only were able to find in ‘guilty’ of only ONE - for which he was fined $300,000. It has to do with a charge of using tax dollar funds to teach a college course including politics.
He took their word for it - apologized and paid the fine.
OOPS! Funny thing happened. Later, as a result of the IRS looking these all over, they found he was INNOCENT of that charge - perfectly legal college course - no politics.
but did Newt get his $300,000 back? No. Did he get an apology? No. Did the media spend even 1/100ths time and ink of his exoneration as three years on his ‘disgrace?”
NO.
Was the lefts usual attack and destroy methods successful?
Yes.
http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/newt.html
Do clueless Sheeple dutifully swallow their lies without doing independent research?
YES. (look in the mirror)
I have been politically active all of my life (starting at 17)
Newt is not new to me. So save it. Paul will not get the nomination. He seems more interested in getting his ideology out.
When the Republicans kicked Newt out of Congress. (he resigned due to NO support. What happened to the guy that became Speaker. Within days an ANONYMOUS source told the media that the new speaker had an affair many years ago. He and his wife were still together and it was history. But everyone at the time knew full well it was a Newt dirty trick.
BTW did you know Newt started out as a campaign official for Rockefeller. (Of Rockefeller Republican fame)
Well-played.