Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper
Forbes wants Perry to wound Gingrich in Iowa so Romney can have a bigger victory in Newt Hampshire.

Palin was for Forbes in 1996.

Forbes was not for Romney in 2008.

Forbes is for neither Romney nor Gingrich in 2012. This should not be surprising to anyone with even a minor command of the facts.

So, if you're Steve Forbes, with a magazine and residue of cred to your name, whom do you support in 2012?

I was for the guy who turned out to be the Godfather of bimbo eruptions. So, now I need to recalibrate.

If Bachmann can make it, she has my vote. If Perry can make it, I'll vote for him. If Ron catches on, what the hell, he has my vote. Hell, even if Huntsman ...

If Gingrich is the nominee, he'll have my enthusiastic support! But fasten your seatbelts, folks, for a Gingrich Administration!

But, God forbid, the plastic, fake, phony Romney!

34 posted on 12/08/2011 12:05:14 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody

If you want to throw daggers with “This should not be surprising to anyone with even a minor command of the facts.”

Then you should not be wasting my time replying about Bachmann, Perry or Paul winning the nomination. Because if YOU had even a minor command of the facts then you would see they blew their chances - LoL!


35 posted on 12/08/2011 1:18:26 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (1/3/2012-Iowa 1/10-Newt Hampshire 1/21-South Carolina 1/31-Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson