Posted on 12/03/2011 9:45:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
1st Nutball Brigade?
ROTFL
Amen.
What, they going to add an assisted living wing to the White House?
IIRC, she said nice things about all the cadidates in the Hanity interview. This pundit is just cherry picking to create a stir.
And just what kind of glasses are you looking at Paul with. You have got to be jesting! The very First Priority of the President of the United States is this Nations Security!....Which a Candidates positions on foreign policy come into play in a very substantial and significant way. If weak there the rest doesn;t mean a hill of beans.
Not to mention he's simply to old and we're seeing this in him at every debate when he looses control of himself. Not that almost 80 year olds do that....but Paul surely does and has all the earmarks of one who certainly can't be trust ed as President when it comes to our safety. My gosh man..the dude thinks Iran needs to have their own nukes!...do you think any of your liberal ideals will matter when a missle comes flying across our nation!
but will that slow down Ron Paul’s momentum?
Ron Paul has momentum?? Who knew!
I’m sure like the rest of us, Palin realized that Ron Paul’s elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top floor. Yes, he has his kool aid drinkers that latch on to individual issues that they agree with, but unfortunately, a president Paul would also base his foreign policy on his looney, “America had it comin’” theory. And his antisemitism, is only thinly veiled.
You can be right on the FED and still be Crazy, as Rue, I mean Ron, Paul demonstrates on a daily basis.
um. Palin been saying nice thing about every gop candidate. Why do you assume she somehow against Paul
I don’t know what the author’s beef is.
Yep, but so far, every president since Eisenhower has failed to secure our southern border. We have fought wars all over the globe, but we can't seem to`close the back door. Wonder why that is?
The problem with Ron Paul is he may spin lots of wheels, but he does not get anything done. Look at his legislation record in Congress. He has sponsored all kinds of bills, but none have been passed. With that track record, how do we expect that he will get anything done as President?
Unfortunately, Rep. Michele Bachmann has the same problem. That’s why we normally pick governors, vice presidents and generals.
Army of one.
Thumbs Up - for a ‘good job’ - or for her choice of nominee for President. (OK; will go and read this; but it pains me. . .)
Well said.
I feel exactly the same.
Like him or not, he’s the only current candidate that would actually work to drag this country, kicking and screaming, back towards the Constitution, and Rule of Law.
I feel your pain, but I can’t agree with your strategy. We are in a two front war, Marxists within and Islamicists without. We can’t abandon one front to consolidate the other. We have to manage both simultaneously. We have no choice. Ron Paul may help us domestically, but he may kill us internationally.
Who am I supporting? Well, aside from the fact I’d like Sarah to reconsider, I haven’t really made my mind up and could go for anybody but Paul or the consensus RINOs (i.e., those whose “RINOism” no one here would seriously dispute, like Romney, Huntsman, etc.). Yes I am considering even Newt. I have an oddball theory about him I got from my dad, who once told me that generally, presidents with weak electoral victories tend to govern better, by which I think he meant they were, out of necessity, more sensitive to the will of the people. Having a pure conservative ideologue would be great, but I can see an upside to having someone in there who is only just sort of conservative but really wants to keep his job by doing what we hire him to do. Yes, it is somewhat cynical, but it also resonates well with how the Founders viewed human nature, and why they invented a system that accounted for sometimes self-serving people rising to power. It could work, and likely would work much better than having a leftist ideologue at the helm.
You paulbots are complete morons.
He is going to vote for Obama by running Tird Party.
All 15 of them.
Last election had little groups of them standing in parking lots with their signs. Don't know if they thought it would light a fire for his campaign or if they were seeking comfort from each other.
But Ron Paul has never been able to explain the origin of his anti-Israel ideology.
Of course, nobody else has either. Not from a morally justifiable position.
Again—Ron Paul is anti-Israel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.