I want Cain for president. His 999 will be worked out. I don’t career politicians in DC.
Go pimp your blog elsewhere. IBTZ.
This is actually a very good article. You should have posted the whole thing.
Cain has a significant record of positive achievements. A president seldom gets what he wants. Remember it’s Congress that ultimately writes the legislation. The 9 9 9 plan will go through some changes. That Cain has tackled one of the most difficult problems facing this country and is willing to speak out when a true politician equivocates, speaks volumes.
Cain is the right man at a critical time for this country. The last thing we need now is a politician who knows how to get along by going along. Congress is going to be in the unenviable position of facing someone who won’t hesitate to take them to the woodshed if they don’t shape up.
When you study how many are coming out against Cain, you can tell Cain threatens the status quo that got us into this situation. Cain, to his credit, is not a person who will muddle through. He’s going to hold a lot of feet to the fire.
A person who succeeds in business ethically, he’ll likely be an ethical politician.
People tend to be consistent in their behaviour.
Only experience permits a president to project the consequences of action down the road on how it will used against the country as it is implemented by leftists.
For example, Palin was taken in by the horrid speech of military funeral protesters and supported a state's “hate speech” laws that forbade them to protest military funerals.
In a moment of emotionally driven tunnel vision, she did not see that if the Supreme Court upheld this state law, she would soon be a target of “hate speech” laws enacted by leftists all over the country and in the Federal government.
A leader has to have had the experience in National politics and law to understand how the left’s “camel nose under the tent” operates and project where it will go. Cain is a walking talking victim, waiting to happen in this sense. On the other hand, you would have to get up pretty early in the morning to trick Newt of Perry. Romney would gladly use this strategy against the US and our constitution as he did in Massachusetts.
Why keep harping on his tax plan. It hasn’t got a snowvballs chance i hell of passing anyway.
Maybe we should just keep Obama’a plan and go on borrowing and robbing the hard working 53%,until we go bankrupt and collapse.
Yes: Tax those oil companies and raise the price of fuel, that will work
Yes ;Tax those corporations and raise the cost of their products. That works great too.
Take away the rich mans incentive to make more money so that he either moves to another country or quits making money. That will work too.
Elect John J. Gahootinbollock if we have to , but get this lunatic ,Narcissist, Racist ,Mutt out of the White House.
I think a lot of people on our side are trying to be cute thinking that:
- Anyone we put up is the automatic winner in November.
- Romney isnt running this year.
- You have just a wonderful selection of choices waiting in the background. YOU DONT.
So my suggestions to the conservative electorate is to get behind someone NOW, stop trying to write everything to death and remember that the mission is to get rid of Obama not to feel 100% ok with the conservative nominee.
But your options at this point are:
Vote for someone you know has been corrupted by the current establishment
or
Vote for the outsider who has not been corrupted but there is possibility he may be.
That is why I was supporter of Palin, She has proved she will stand firm on her values, but it may be easier in Alaska then Washington
“...in many ways it bothers me that he has no elected official record...”
I have two word reply that must be fully answered before I give a .... about this blog: Barack Obama.
Why not post it here?
Do you need blog hits? Is that how you make your money?
What do you use the money for? Do you smoke crack?
Do you get all cracked up and commit crimes?
Pimping your blog here is a crime.
There you go.
” - - - I think I would have an easier time accepting his words if he could actually stick to those words but not only has he flip flopped numerous times - I would say he has outright lied in some instances.
These are just two examples (there are others) of Herman Cain saying one thing and then changing his story, whether it was because he wasn’t knowledgeable enough to understand the question and he didn’t want to sound stupid or because political pressure was applied, he changed his story and sometimes within a very short time. - - - “
Hi MomE. Above is a direct copy of a part of your article.
Note the gap between the upper and lower parts of your text. That gap is where you stopped writing and inserted TVspeak clips.
Yep, you just can’t bring yourself to write the words that you can be held to, now can you?
No, No, NOT Mommy E! You rely on the smoke-and-mirror sound bites of our sorry, tabloid, pop-culture “main-stream-media” to help us “feel” your point.
You can run, but you cannot hide here at FR.
If you are going to make a point on FR, then, at a minimum, have the courage to put it into words that YOU can defend. Got it?
BTW, we at FR love to have reasoned DIALOG, so adding a rational viewpoint would be a refreshing touch to any future articles that you may choose to post here on FR.
BTW, BTW, are you into numerology? Come on! It is fun! Watch: 9 + 9 + 9 = 27. Then: 2 + 7 = 9.
BTW, BTW, BTW, a Nine out of Ten is what I now give Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 Tax EVERYBODY Plan. I’ll give him a Ten once 9-9-9 becomes the law of the land.
“...we have no record of how that person would react under pressure,...” Of course, the role of CEO in the private sector doesn’t involve any sort of pressure. Climbing to the top of the heap doesn’t require political astuteness. I usually express appreciation for my first lol of the day in PM, but....
Why do we have to do that? Do you have copyright issues with yourself that you can't just post the whole thing here?
You are being a classic blog-pimp. Just post your whole blog entry and everything would be cool, nobody would be complaining about your attempt to steer hits to your website.
Welcome to FR, Newbie. Who’s your candidate? And did you know that FreeRepublic is a conservative forum? We believe in the US Constitution and the Constitution makes no requirement that a candidate for the presidency be an experienced politician. None. In fact, kids in this country have grown up since its inception with the idea that they could aspire to the presidency and someday attain it. I see nowhere in the Constitution that requires one to become a career politician in order to attain that office. Do you?
So, are you saying that having career, inside-the-beltway, politicians is fine, and that our crop of potential candidates for the presidency should come through them? Or if not solely them, then perhaps our governorships? Is that where this idea against Herman Cain is leading? Bad, bad bad.
Oh, and thanks for pimping your blog...
(Oh, ~~~Please!~~~ Read-Share-Love my blog with me! I do ~so~ love it when you read-share-love my blog.....)
Let me start out by saying how little I respect blog pimps.
Thank you so much for your vile language, hateful personal attacks, and pathetic ignorance. Apparently I am a blog pimp. That might hold more water if I had actually done it more than ONCE. Nowhere that is easily found does it say anything about posting to your own blog. I didn’t know this until after I was attacked over and over and over and over and over again. Only ignorant people resort to personal attacks to get their message across. If I could have figured out how to take my blog down and fix it I would have but so far I haven’t been able to figure that out. From now on I will make sure that I do it correctly. Thank you to all of the people who came to my defense and actually understood that this was not an intentional disregard for the rules. To all the others - God bless you.