Replies

Unfortunately, this is not true. Palin has huge negatives mostly because of MSM attacks on her. Most recently, she has been painted as being ignorant of history because of her Paul Revere remarks. It makes little difference that she was correct. Average Americans, who are not seriously engaged in politics, are influenced by the main story and pay little attention to back page corrections.

Sorry, but it is true.

How do you feel parrotting the left-wing press and the DNC and some of the more purient parts of the GOP elite?

Reagan was down more than 30% in polling to Carter in 1980 less than a year from the General Election. Palin isn't even close to being that much underwater and you are throwing up your arms and saying we can't win with Palin?

What are you, a DU troll or a GOP operative from a competing potential POTUS candidate?

With all the lies, propaganda and false quotes from the LSM, at least we still have the polls, 18 months before an election, that we can rely on to be accurate.

Uh, right?

LOL.

Do you ever even read your replies? I acknowledged the fact that Pain has high negatives mostly because of (unfair) attacks on her by the MSM. To this your juvenile reply is:
"How do you feel parrotting the left-wing press and the DNC and some of the more purient parts of the GOP elite? "
"What are you, a DU troll or a GOP operative from a competing potential POTUS candidate?"
You are exactly the type of "support" Palin does not need. She does not need knee-jerk cultists who attack others because they perceive what they consider a "slight" whether there is one or not. Independents especially recoil from such mindlessness.
To disagree with my post, you either have to deny that Palin has high negatives or deny that they are mostly caused by attacks by the MSM. Either denial could only be based on pure ignorance.

Please, stop trying to support Palin in public, supporters like you only bring her down.