Skip to comments.
Blue state Republicans should NOT be the Presidential nominee
Nolan Chart ^
| May 31, 2011
| Mark Vogl
Posted on 06/01/2011 9:45:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: napscoordinator
Florida is not a blue state. It elects 95% republican.
41
posted on
06/02/2011 5:15:46 AM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: ilgipper
Florida is not a blue state. It elects 95% republican.
Florida gave Obama the Presidency I would say at best it is purple. Plus it has 50 percent Blue Senators.
The real question is can republicans win the presidency with just the conservative voting base? Are there enough of us out here that we can afford to discount he rest of the population?
To: jersey117
Is that really the question? The answer is clear: no.
To: Ted Grant
That’s a logical question in my mind. Conservatives seem to want a 100% pure candidate. I would love nothing better. But if we don’t have the numbers to pull off the win, what good is having the perfect conservative nominee? Obama is destroying the United States of America. I will vote for just about anyone over him. This election in particular should be primarily about the economy.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why the country needs to be divided North-South Red-Blue, again. The regional political divide is now too large for a political solution, even larger than in 1860. Then it was just one or two issues, now the difference are legion.
"The withdrawal of a State from a league has no revolutionary or insurrectionary characteristic. The government of the State remains unchanged as to all internal affairs. It is only its external or confederate relations that are altered. To term this action of a Sovereign a 'rebellion' is a gross abuse of language."
President Davis, CSA
46
posted on
06/02/2011 6:22:29 AM PDT
by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: jersey117
Jersey, your post explains why the article’s premise is sound.
47
posted on
06/02/2011 6:23:52 AM PDT
by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But it doesn’t show depending on how he combs his hair.
48
posted on
06/02/2011 6:36:34 AM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: ansel12
>>>>Your last two posts on this thread are gibberish,I dont know what you are trying to say.
Because your mind is closed to anything beyond social concerns. Once you hear the magic words to satisfy your needs, your brain turns off. Being socially conservative is not enough. That’s the point you are missing, or dare I say deliberately ignoring.
49
posted on
06/02/2011 6:51:41 AM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
To: Keith in Iowa
I notice that you didn’t try to explain his posts, what did post 37 mean for instance.
50
posted on
06/02/2011 8:18:43 AM PDT
by
ansel12
( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
To: jersey117
But if we dont have the numbers to pull off the win, what good is having the perfect conservative nominee?
The perfect conservative nominee will get a lot more votes than a RINO from both conservatives and from "independents." This is just a matter of fact, not conjecture.
51
posted on
06/02/2011 8:29:01 AM PDT
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson