Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
The War Powers Act is unconstitutional. Every President since it was passed has treated it as such. The President's power as CinC is not infinite, but it does cover a lot of ground. Congress has some leverage because the President can't do anything for long without an appropriation to fund it. That said, complaining that Presidents haven't complied with the War Powers act is strictly for the tin foil hat fringe.
10 posted on 05/03/2011 4:06:27 PM PDT by fluffdaddy (Who died and made the Supreme Court God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fluffdaddy
"The War Powers Act is unconstitutional. "

You forgot to preface that with "In my opinion". It's pretty clear that it's still good law.

"Every President since it was passed has treated it as such. "

Yes, that's the problem and that's how we end up entangling ourselves in places we have absolutely no business being - Kosovo, Somalia, LIBYA etc, etc.

Clinton has made it pretty clear that if wasn't for the abortion that was Operation Gothic Serpant, he would have unilaterally intervened in Rawanda. Wouldn't that have been swell?

So, if we have presidents that ignore US law for long enough, those laws become dead letters, or something?

Maybe Posse Comitatus is unconstitutional too? Should presidents just ignore that as well?

We need to get back to some basics. If there's not enough popular support to get a congressional authorization to involve ourselves in some military engagement in a faraway land, then we shouldn't do it. We have got to STOP indulging a President's personal whim to play world police.

13 posted on 05/03/2011 4:22:43 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson