Posted on 04/24/2011 8:49:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
“former liberal” my little toe
Really the reflexive Trump-slams around here are getting tiresome.
How about let the man speak.
If he’s a liberal, we’ll figure it out. He seems mostly to be more aware and right on than (anyone) else except Palin so far.
He would be just like Zer0, except with lighter skin...
The celebutard donated to Harry Reid and Rahm Emmanuel just months ago.
“let the man speak” and who is trying to prevent that??
I remember the “Scott Brown for President” movement, that guy is a LIBERAL. I didn’t like him from the start, I just noticed he was running against the spawn of Satan.
I don’t swoon for politicians or get crushes on celebrities.
LOL. Yeah ok I sort of liked Brown.
Especially that truck.
The MSM would throw a party if the GOP nominates the clown.
Wow, finally a halfway decent article about Trump! Thanks!
I think he’ll be like a “pragmatist” in the Nixon sense.
Eminant Domain has helped make him rich.
Well as long as all the rest of our so-called field are mute and speechless (or is that redundant) I’ll keep defending him.
I mean, I could be distracted pretty easily to defend someone else - if anyone else were actually speaking up...
(crickets)
Who do you plan to support, a winner or a strict ideologue?
Anybody who gives money to Rahm Emanuel will not get my vote.
The article wasn’t bad until here:
“In foreign policy, his thin skin is likely to be his undoing. Negotiations revolve around stances, which are modified if need be as the negotiation continues.”
Wrong. His waffling might get him into trouble, but a “sticks to his guns” President who other countries think is a bit of a loose cannon gets his way. See Reagan.
Also, he doesn’t have to open the US’s wallet to buy support. He just has to threaten to close the wallet.
PS I do NOT want Trump, but he would be infinitely better than Obama.
No one is stopping him.
So far he is silent and doesn't attack Obama and the Democrats on their problems with free markets, capitalism, limited government, individual rights, conservatism and the Constitution (outside of the NBC requirement).
I listened to Trump explain that donation on Rush.
Seemed like realpolitik.
I don’t know it seemed like a pretty good explanation to me. Certainly believable.
If nothing else; if it was BS, Trump’s awfully darn good at it...
No teleprompters will be necessary for Trump, that’s for certain. :)
“Who do you plan to support, a winner or a strict ideologue”
A conservative and a winner the two are not mutually exclusive..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.