[NVDave]

Uh, that would likely be a “no.”

I profess to be completely befuddled when I see the people at National Review fawn over Romney. I cannot for the life of me see what Romney has that we need.

And Huckabee... please, no more southern Bible-thumpers posing as “conservatives.”

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

National review is no conservative mag and going all in on willard proves it.They claim to be conservative.They dont know the meaning of the word.

[Catsrus]

I don’t mind someone “thumping the Bible,” as some disrespectfully say, but, NO to Huckabee - he’s a big RINO.

[samtheman]

I cannot for the life of me see what Romney has that we need.

Whatever you say you need, he'll say he's got. Go ahead, name it; Romney'll claim it.

This guy flip-flops more than Kerry. And it will be easy for the dims to show it.

The media is salivating over Romney because he'll be so easy for The Kenyan King to run against.