Skip to comments.
Analysis: Palin takes own tack in presidential prelude
Reuters ^
| March 27, 2011
| Steve Holland
Posted on 03/27/2011 1:34:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: GlockThe Vote
At this stage they take in pledges for support. Romney has a strong lead because of the large Corporations backing him.
Pawlenty is also getting pledges. So is the Huckster and Palin.
41
posted on
03/27/2011 2:19:27 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, that certainly qualifies as impolite, doesn’t it?
He shouldn’t have said that.
To: Walts Ice Pick
That, by itself would have just got him in trouble or maybe suspended, but it was a history of such things that finally did it, IMO. I don’t know that, but I’m guessing.
43
posted on
03/27/2011 2:22:38 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
To: JPG
You do set the standard high before the race even starts, don’t you? Let’s hope she can live up to your unlimited expectations.
44
posted on
03/27/2011 2:23:51 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, I'm confident that when the time comes, he'll be pulling the lever for Sarah Palin.
And, I'll bet he's pleased as punch that I'm here to say that on his behalf. ;-)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I don't think that there needs to be a rush still to get out there as a declared candidate," she said in New Delhi. "I think there's still plenty of time...
Here's to You Sarah
Go Sarah Go! Run Sarah Run!!
|
|
|
46
posted on
03/27/2011 2:25:38 PM PDT
by
B-Cause
(Great crises do not make men, they reveal them.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The pisser will be back, believe it. He has been very much involved in this forum over the years.
Look, they even brought Willie Green back. (Just my gut feeling)
47
posted on
03/27/2011 2:28:39 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
How ‘bout we let it all play out and then we will see what we will see. I'm willing to do that, are you?
48
posted on
03/27/2011 2:28:56 PM PDT
by
JPG
("2012 Can't Come Soon Enough" - Sarah Palin)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
“...she was not getting much financial support from Big Corporations.”
The fascists understand Constitutional Government is better for We the People than them....don’t look for them just “not supporting her”....where do you think all her negative press originates?
49
posted on
03/27/2011 2:29:36 PM PDT
by
mo
("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
To: JPG
You are exactly right......I have always strongly believed this. And let’s be sure to be painstakingly civil towards each other in the process.
It only helps our cause all the more.
50
posted on
03/27/2011 2:32:05 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have no more information about what she may do, as the late Harry S. Truman used to say, “than a hog knows about Sunday.” But a wild thought streaked through my beady little six-volt mind this morning while preparing to attend Divine Services.
That with the reception Michelle Bachmann got in Iowa Saturday, and the way Ms. Bachmann sat all the male wannabes in the shade; Sarah Palin may just leave it to Michelle, and spend HER political capital campaigning for Michelle. I’d rather see SARAH run, or even the two of them run together, but who knows?
51
posted on
03/27/2011 2:32:18 PM PDT
by
Tucker39
To: Huck
“Shes in over her head on foreign policy”
Then you must think many in the GOP is in over their head as well. She’s spouting the same take as McCain and many others.
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
On that point we can shake hands and agree.
53
posted on
03/27/2011 2:33:46 PM PDT
by
JPG
("2012 Can't Come Soon Enough" - Sarah Palin)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm a supporter of Sarah Palin, the only conservative of note that is a possible contender for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination. Like many, I'm not entirely on board with Palin's stance on the military action in Libya but I'm not ready to abandon Palin on that issue, alone. I didn't agree with everything Ronald Reagan said or did - before and during his presidency - but I always supported and voted for him and I've never regretted it.
Some Freepers apparently have decided that Sarah Palin is 'not acceptable' as the 2012 Republican party presidential nominee. Whether that decision is based on her resume, her gender, her policies or something else. Well, that's politics. Although I get annoyed with repetitive postings that consistently denigrate Palin and by so doing seek to antagonize her supporters or the posting of articles from leftist sources that bash Sarah Palin (often on specious grounds) I don't necessarily believe the people making those posts/threads should be banned unless they willfully violate site rules or simply become trolls seeking to stir up arguments that do nothing for the site or it's readers. We're not DU or the Koz.
54
posted on
03/27/2011 2:33:52 PM PDT
by
Jim Scott
('The collapse of the Entitlement State is not going to be pretty'. - Mark Steyn)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That's difference in a liberal and a conservative candidate or potential candidate. Liberals only have to find one thing they agree on with the candidate and it's off to the races. Conservatives only need to find one thing they disagree with the candidate on and it's curtains for that candidate.
That's how we end up with the Peolsi’s, et al.
55
posted on
03/27/2011 2:36:33 PM PDT
by
jwparkerjr
(I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
To: Tucker39
Good points. I saw that article too. Michelle really did knock them (The crowd) dead and may be more of a contender than some of us realize.
Her early start HAS made a difference it seems.
56
posted on
03/27/2011 2:38:25 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: JPG
57
posted on
03/27/2011 2:39:16 PM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She seems to be running already, sort like a Gomer Pyle campaign. She’s a lot of like Gomer, but you know that already.
58
posted on
03/27/2011 2:39:19 PM PDT
by
unique
To: webstersII; Huck
If the Huck doesn't, I DO.
The bulk of the political class is is delusional on this and operating from an emotional perspective rather than reason.
59
posted on
03/27/2011 2:39:53 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: Huck
Last time I heard, she said very clearly: NO troops on the ground. That was on Greta I think. No fly zone should have been done a month ago and NO troops on the ground. Please show us a tape or post where she said troops on the ground. Thanks .
60
posted on
03/27/2011 2:41:44 PM PDT
by
American Dream 246
(Open your eyes. Freedom is not a one day fight. Enemies of Freedom are legion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson