[Regulator]

means staying away from issues such as abortion rights and immigration

Yup. Why run on real winning issues when you can run on say, cutting the budget 3% more than Jerry Geezer?

Real winners these guys.

[Pelham]

They can offer up their ‘inclusive’ Big Tent candidates all they want. I won’t vote for them.

[newzjunkey]

means staying away from issues such as abortion rights and immigration

Why run on real winning issues

Abortion reduction is not a winning issue in CA. We've tried a number of times to get just a simple notification of even one parent/guardian before abortions are performed on young girls. Fails every time it's on the ballot no matter how watered down. Prop 4, Sarah's Law, is one example.

Immigration has been a toxic issue in CA since 1994's Prop 187. was struck down by Carter appointee (Mariana Pfaelzer) for infringing on the fed's right to set immigration policy. Gov Pete Wilson (R) appealed but was termed out. Not unlike Obama's DOMA move, in 1999 Gov. Grey Davis (D) decided not to appeal the Prop 187 decision.

Eighteen years later and resentment is very high among a increasingly Hispanic majority brainwashed by La Raz, Reconquista lies, "Mexifornia" spanish-language media and Democrat race-baiting.