Judging the wisdom of choosing a particular Presidential nominee based on "popularity" as determined by the alleged number of Google results?!?
Are all P.O.W.'s (Palin Obsessive Worshipers) on mind-altering drugs? Have you lost all sense of reality?
Alright, everybody, since that is how we should choose Presidential nominees, let's all do a little experiment:
Go to Google, start typing in names, and let's see what results we get. (Do it yourself if you don't believe my results):
Sarah Palin: "About 31,400,000 results (0.11 seconds)"
Lindsay Lohan: "About 41,000,000 results (0.06 seconds)"
Barack Obama: "About 81,100,000 results (0.09 seconds)"
Paris Hilton: "About 82,400,000 results (0.09 seconds)"
Kim Kardashian: "About 174,000,000 results (0.07 seconds)"
Lady Gaga: "About 268,000,000 results (0.15 seconds)"
So, by a crushing landslide, based on having "more Google results for her than anyone else .... including the current de facto president of the United States" ......
The logical Republican nominee for President of the United States should be:
LADY GAGA!
Instead of inventing ridiculous benchmarks such as "Google results" for judging the ability of Sarah Palin to defeat Barack Obama, maybe you need to stop drinking the Sarah Palin Cult of Personality Kool Aid, get back down to the Planet Earth and look reality straight in the face.
THIS is the reality of a Sarah Palin candidacy: A guaranteed reelection victory for Barack Hussein Obama.
FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)
Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.
Sarah Palin:
.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of
ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%
Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%
Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%
Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%