Robin Marty
Robin Marty is a freelance writer and editor from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Formerly, she worked as the Director of Special Projects for the Center for Independent Media, a progressive online news organization with sites across the country
Not only can the country handle more “anti-islamic rhetoric”, but there NEEDS to be more.
The real question, can it handle more “Anti-judeo-christian” rhetoric ? I think not.
Robin Marty
Robin Marty is a freelance writer and editor from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Formerly, she worked as the Director of Special Projects for the Center for Independent Media, a progressive online news organization with sites across the country
I’m pro Zuhdi Jasser.
Obviously, this moron has never heard of 09-11-01. He/she is going to look good in a burqa.
I do not believe that I could be any more Anti Islamo-fascist than I already am.
But, I’ll work on it.
>Can the country handle even more anti-Islamic rhetoric in our national debate?<
.
If muslims chuck the teachings in the Koran, stop persecuting Christians all over the world and start joining the human race, they won’t have any problems.
I doubt that presently a sensible debate with them is even possible.
The term anti-Islamic is also referred to as just simply telling the truth.
No demagoguing, not hysteria, not stereotyping or racism at all, but just the plain factual documented truth.
Are we expected to just let them pee on our heads and tell us it is raining? Should we just ignore everything they have written, and said, and done worldwide? What do all their countries look like?
Would it be best if we would just lay down and accept Islam as the ‘superior’ culture.
I don’t even understand what ‘anti-Islam’ means. Unless it means not being a blind idiot.
Anyone would have to be crazy to support or even condone that murderous death cult. They kill people constantly across the globe. Women are no more than slaves with no rights. And they are the single most openly proud racist organization on the planet.
Come on! I’m not a stupid fool. Of course I am anti-Islam. Who wouldn’t be?
You betcha! And here is just the individual to deliver it!
Can the country handle even more anti-Islamic rhetoric in our national debate?
After 9/11...you bet babe!
I never liked the idea or application of loyalty oaths except for taking such an oath in order to fullfill usual requirements of citizenship. However,because there is a need to separate any allegience to any law ,in total, from our Constitution and It’s structure of law(s) for separation of civil and religious laws, there has to be some means to have Muslims swear to the laws of our Constitution as paramount over any corresponding/conflicting part of Sharia Law.
I never liked the idea or application of loyalty oaths except for taking such an oath in order to fullfill usual requirements of citizenship. However,because there is a need to separate any allegience to any law ,in total, from our Constitution and It’s structure of law(s) for separation of civil and religious laws, there has to be some means to have Muslims swear to the laws of our Constitution as paramount over any corresponding/conflicting part of Sharia Law.