To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ah, the keen legal mind of Sarah Palin.
Too bad Roberts, Scalia and Thomas disagree.
As do I. What they’re doing is protected speech, as disgusting as it is.
To: Retired Greyhound
6 posted on
03/02/2011 3:12:17 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(All gave some, some gave all.)
To: Retired Greyhound
I agree. That is what the Westboro knows. They want so called Constitutional conservatives to come out against the Constitution.
Then they gotcha!
9 posted on
03/02/2011 3:18:47 PM PST by
dforest
To: Retired Greyhound
Absolutely.
As hateful as it is, it is protected under the constitution.
Nothing says they cant suffer a fatal accident though.
14 posted on
03/02/2011 3:27:06 PM PST by
crz
To: Retired Greyhound
It’s not free speech, it’s harrassment...plain and simple.
18 posted on
03/02/2011 3:33:16 PM PST by
Pure Country
(“I’ve noticed that every person that is for abortion has already been born.” -Ronald Reagan)
To: Retired Greyhound
Ah, the keen legal mind of Sarah Palin.
We’ve had enough lawyers as POTUS thank you. We need someone with both a brain and a heart. Since the military cemeteries are public property, the demonstrators can’t be kept out. What needs to change is the designation of private events on public property. If I rent a city facility for a wedding, I can keep others out. If I can’t, then why am I paying to rent it. The same situation needs to apply to a military funeral. The area around the event should be able to be secured from non-participants. Maybe the attorneys didn’t argue this case properly. You may have the right to say what you want without restriction, but I’m not required to hear it just because you want me to.
To: Retired Greyhound
As do I. What theyre doing is protected speech, as disgusting as it is.
Nonsense. They are many things that are not protected speech. Seems only certain special interest groups get protected.
Besides they can say their vile crap all they want. That was never the issue. The issue is does their intrusion in to a private citizens funeral violate that persons rights and there can be no question in common sense and common deceny that it does.
To: Retired Greyhound
Did you read her quote, or just the terribly misleading headline? You can disagree with her statement; but she did NOT say what the headline claims she did.
34 posted on
03/02/2011 3:47:51 PM PST by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Retired Greyhound
So harassment is ok? How is this not harassment?
36 posted on
03/02/2011 3:53:29 PM PST by
jackv
(The darkness hates the light!)
To: Retired Greyhound
I think the “keen mind” you should take a look at is your own.
Your mind failed to understand that Palin’s was not a legal statement.
48 posted on
03/02/2011 4:30:28 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
To: Retired Greyhound
Where did she state otherwise?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson