He had to reach back to a 2009 poll? No bias from the reporter on this one...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
CNN polled every single American????
2 posted on
02/21/2011 1:54:30 PM PST by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Would this be the same 70 percent that said Barack Obama WAS qualified to be president, despite the fact that his resume is thinner than Sarah Palin’s?
3 posted on
02/21/2011 1:55:55 PM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Barack Obama has set the bar so low, the qualification argument should never be an issue again.
8 posted on
02/21/2011 2:05:06 PM PST by
BaylorDad
(I don't always buy American, but when I do, it's not UAW!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Heck I’m qualified to be President - I have the paper to prove it....
Barry??? Not so much......
11 posted on
02/21/2011 2:16:09 PM PST by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She’s over 35, a natural born citizen, and has lived in the U.S. for the past 14 years. Those are the only requirements needed.
13 posted on
02/21/2011 2:24:03 PM PST by
K-Stater
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If you listen to the Gov of NE answer it is really good. He says one she was a gov so that puts her above most people. Two in America if you can win the nomination and election you are by definition qualified to be POTUS because you convinced enough of the USA that you were qualified....which is a strict sens eis correct. It goes to the unelectable argument also. If you win you are electable.
Palin’s resume is 20 years of great service to AK and to the country. I don't think the seven idiots what to put their resumes up next to hers.
14 posted on
02/21/2011 2:43:03 PM PST by
unseen1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson