Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Palin runs for presidency, it will be 'to win it'
Agence France-Presse ^ | November 9, 2010

Posted on 11/09/2010 9:36:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: meadsjn

Yep, Michael has turned on her for some reason. Someone has gotten to him I suspect. I’ve never heard anything but praise from him about Palin in the past. It seems almost like a GOP cabal at work to stop her! It won’t work - the good old boys are only going to piss us unwashed masses off! They had better understand the hornet’s nest they are poking their stick into!


21 posted on 11/09/2010 10:32:58 PM PST by JaguarXKE (RINOs be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
Michael has turned on her for some reason.

Michael Reagan had nothing but really positive things to say about Sarah Palin.

The "anonymous" bloggers saying otherwise haven't put forth any evidence that I have seen of anything negative from Michael Reagan.

22 posted on 11/09/2010 11:13:04 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
""I'd be in it to win it."

Unlike her running mate in 2008, who was in it to....well, I don't think he was ever in it.

23 posted on 11/10/2010 3:52:58 AM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Other choices to date: Romney. Huckster. Daniels. Pawlenty. Barbour.

&&&
I think Brownbeck has his eye on the WH, hence his run for government. Perry also is making prez noises, IMO.


24 posted on 11/10/2010 4:14:37 AM PST by Bigg Red (Palin/Hunter 2012 -- Bolton their Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx

He was so moved, his entire opinion of her changed. (Libtard democrat).

&&&
Amazing story. May there be many, many more like it.


25 posted on 11/10/2010 4:18:14 AM PST by Bigg Red (Palin/Hunter 2012 -- Bolton their Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Palin runs for presidency, it will be 'to win it'

What kind of idiot would run for the presidency not to win it?

26 posted on 11/10/2010 4:18:22 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Senator McCain?


27 posted on 11/10/2010 4:25:58 AM PST by jennings2004 ((Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jennings2004
Senator McCain?

The truly sad thing about 2008 was that McCain WAS running to win.

28 posted on 11/10/2010 4:27:36 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Yes, that really showed when he stopped his campaign to go to Washington to blow it up in his face....yes, you are so right!


29 posted on 11/10/2010 5:10:27 AM PST by jennings2004 ((Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; jennings2004

i didnt understand ths phrasing either but i think jennings 2004 captures what she means. it might be a dig at the McCain 2008 campaign, or how about Fred Thompson, was he in to win?

Also every 4 years it seems we have cameo or celebrity candidacies from either party, e.g. Alan Keyes who have no shot. Why do they bother?

It could also mean that she will not run just as a means to promote her celebrity status as a means to keep up her value as an author and speaker, or even as a ploy to be “kingmaker”.


30 posted on 11/10/2010 5:40:35 AM PST by Piers-the-Ploughman (Just say no to circular firing squads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

sure McCain was running to win, but it seemed that he also thought it was no big deal if he didnt. He didnt take off the gloves at all. He did bring a knife to gunfight, and he did so willingly. Pathetic.


31 posted on 11/10/2010 5:43:36 AM PST by Piers-the-Ploughman (Just say no to circular firing squads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
The "anonymous" bloggers saying otherwise haven't put forth any evidence that I have seen of anything negative from Michael Reagan.

I wish it we not so, but here it is:

Reagan rates Republicans

32 posted on 11/10/2010 7:39:40 AM PST by JaguarXKE (RINOs be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson