I hope the GOP starts to smell the coffee.
1 posted on
11/01/2010 10:51:29 AM PDT by
GonzoII
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: GonzoII
If not, THEY can sit in the back of the bus!
2 posted on
11/01/2010 10:54:24 AM PDT by
SMARTY
("..discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you")
To: GonzoII
As I stated in another post the next round of the war starts on the morning of November 3.
To: GonzoII
I feel bad about Rudy in 2008. He was not a hard core conservative but he was WAY better than: McCain, Huckabee, Mitt and sadly Fred - who appeared to sell out to McCain.
4 posted on
11/01/2010 10:55:45 AM PDT by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
To: GonzoII
I always like Giuliani... not that I always agreed with all his positions... but I always liked him.
5 posted on
11/01/2010 10:55:58 AM PDT by
samtheman
To: GonzoII
Like most men here I boil when they attack her personally..BOIL.
The elites of DC and the media have thrown everything at her and her entire family. BASTARDS
6 posted on
11/01/2010 10:57:30 AM PDT by
rrrod
(at home in Medellin Colombia)
To: GonzoII
I do not agree with all of Rudy’s positions but he is one of the best “Crisis Managers” this country has ever seen. If and when this country has a crisis he would be the man I would follow. (Remember 9/11!!)
10 posted on
11/01/2010 10:58:50 AM PDT by
HOYA97
(twitter @hoya97)
To: GonzoII
Karl Rove, the angry misogynist, will not go quietly.
11 posted on
11/01/2010 11:00:10 AM PDT by
jimbo123
To: GonzoII
What GOP leaders?
Rush and Sarah are the leaders...
13 posted on
11/01/2010 11:01:07 AM PDT by
y6162
To: GonzoII
They’re impaired. They can’t see, smell, hear or do. The only thing they can do is talk. I have no use for their blatherings.
To: GonzoII
So he’s sticking up for Sarah, it seems. Good for him. I’m not sure she’s our best candidate, but it’s time for the whispering campaign to stop. If the critics want to challenge her on her ideas, go ahead. But stop the whining, wimpy closet criticisms.
16 posted on
11/01/2010 11:02:22 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
To: GonzoII; mick; sauropod; ColdOne; the lastbestlady; BattleHymn; xzins; chickpundit; MissH; ...
Good on Mister Mayor - he gets it. I am hesitant to over-ping Sarah's List today, but this is a short clip that seems to sum up the cowardly attacks on her by some anonymous "corrupt bastards," AND the repercussions that will follow should they follow through.
![](http://video.foxnews.com/thumbnails/103110/320/240/103110_fns_palin_FNC_103110_15-33.jpg)
18 posted on
11/01/2010 11:04:40 AM PDT by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: GonzoII
If the GOP wants to entrust its voters with choosing its presidential nominees then NOW is the time to reform the primary process:
- Close all primaries in every state. In states which infringe on the peoples' freedom of association by requiring open primaries, then hold closed caucuses instead.
- Stop having the first contests in flamingly blue states. Having the first GOP primary in Wyoming would be a good start.
- The nominee should be decided quickly, but allow for no-name conservatives to get known at the outset of the process. This can be done by having the primary order go as follows:
- Low population red states (Wyoming, Alaska, North and South Dakota, etc.).
- High population red states (Texas, Georgia, etc.)
- High population blue states (these still can have large numbers of conservatives: California, Florida, etc.)
- Low population blue states (New Hampshire, Iowa, etc.)
- Enforce the rules... any state that goes out of turn should have its delegates stripped and re-distributed to the states that do follow them. To make the contest end quickly, have these delegates redistributed to the lower population states.
This system will ensure that liberals have the smallest possible impact on the GOP nominating process.
21 posted on
11/01/2010 11:06:28 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: GonzoII
Hmm, I recall a lot of pics of Rudy dressed like a woman and anger at Sean for putting him on the radio show so much.
Why is everything in red?
22 posted on
11/01/2010 11:08:45 AM PDT by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: GonzoII
Rudy's stock just skyrocketed in a Palin administration. I always thought Director of Homeland Security was his job.
25 posted on
11/01/2010 11:10:22 AM PDT by
McGruff
(A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
To: GonzoII
As a NYer I would have loved for him to run for Gov. or Senator....
I will vote Republican for these, but dont think they can win in this state....Rudy on the other hand would have won either senator or governor and would have been conservative on many issues...
I would never vote for Rudy in the primaries for President...but like someone said, he would have been better than the smelly $h!t we now have in office and better than McCain.
26 posted on
11/01/2010 11:10:30 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
To: GonzoII
As a NYer I would have loved for him to run for Gov. or Senator....
I will vote Republican for these, but dont think they can win in this state....Rudy on the other hand would have won either senator or governor and would have been conservative on many issues...
I would never vote for Rudy in the primaries for President...but like someone said, he would have been better than the smelly $h!t we now have in office and better than McCain.
28 posted on
11/01/2010 11:11:31 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
To: GonzoII
Giuliani: And let's not go through the negativity, we got a big admission here, that Sarah Palin has every right to make her case to the Republican party, how about we let Republicans decide, not their so-called "leaders," whether she's qualified or not. Let her make her case, like everybody else gets to make their case. I got a chance to make mine, I didn't succeed, but I'm happy about he fact that I got a chance to make my case. Let's give her a chance to make her case, and let the Republican party decide, not a bunch of so-called "leaders." And I think they're missing the whole point, of what's going on in our election right now, cause that's the worst possible way, to take that kind of a lesson out of this election.
I think this time, we've gotta have a national committee that disciplines Republicans who attack other Republicans, and I see it starting already, and it really disturbs me. And I think whoever does it is going to pay a big price this time. Look at all those races where so called "establishment Republicans" were rejected... there's a reason for that. People are trying to tell us something, we should be listening, and I've got every confidence that... that this new class elected in Congress is going to do what they were elected for.
32 posted on
11/01/2010 11:15:07 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: GonzoII
Good for Rudy.
He’s running again.
To: GonzoII
The support for Murkowski and the non-support for O’Donnell should have given everyone a clue as to what we could expect from the Old Guard, particularly in terms of Sarah.
37 posted on
11/01/2010 11:19:41 AM PDT by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: GonzoII
All you have to do is watch Sarah Palin on chris Wallace this week to see that she is unbeatable. Especially after tomorrow.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson