Replies

But you make it sound like it's the end all be all of the end for them if they were to run for public office.

Not at all. Character counts and is open for question but I certainly would like to see more attention paid to the issues. However I also know better than to expect the media, any media, to actually do that.

How come ? you trust Obama's word for it, about his eligibility, but, you do not give O'Donnell the same benefit of the doubt.. ?

And where have I ever said I trust Obama's word on anything?

That's the very point that we ( as you would call us " Birthers " ) have been trying to make about Obama's records, but, somehow, there are some that don't want it to be a matter of " Public Record " ... even though ? the public has the right to know in the case of Obama's records...

And let me be the first to say that you Birthers are doing a bang-up job of it too.

If Occidental or Columbia or Harvard had sued Obama over unpaid tuition then that would be public record, too. Likewise, if Chase had had to foreclose on his house. If O'Donnell wants to release her school records or her birth certificate or other private information then I applaud her for it and wish Obama would do the same. But legally I can't see forcing even Obama to do so if he won't. And I don't support forcing O'Donnell to do so if she decides to keep her private information private.

Please ? I appeal to you, that maybe there is a shed of light maybe somewhere deep within that the public has the right to know about their President and CIC.
Only time will tell whether he is prove to be eligible or not, but, we just don't know.
If he is eligible ? then I think most " Birthers " would be fine with that in spite of the fact that we differ so far from what he believes in.
Besides, O'Donnell is not the President of the USA.
Can't you just for a period of time step back, and put yourself in the shoes of the birthers ?
Don't you even get a hint that there is something just not right about Obama's eligibility ?

“If O’Donnell wants to release her school records or her birth certificate or other private information then I applaud her for it and wish Obama would do the same. But legally I can’t see forcing even Obama to do so if he won’t. And I don’t support forcing O’Donnell to do so if she decides to keep her private information private.”

I asked you before in the thread, how does Obama get passed the new Republican SOS’s as a presidential candidate? they have standing to request records from Hawaii DOH to confirm any abbreviated secondary documents from Obama.

Its a SOS’s legal duty to ensure candidate eligibility, if a candidate refuses to produce documents, the SOS can request a court order.

Ordinary people can’t break down Obama’s legal shields, but SOS’s can, whats your answer to that?