Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: The MSM’s Unquechable Curiosity Reserved for O’Donnell, Not Obama
Death by a Thousand Papercuts ^ | September 25, 2010 | Mondo Frazier

Posted on 09/25/2010 11:35:14 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last
To: American Constitutionalist
But you make it sound like it's the end all be all of the end for them if they were to run for public office.

Not at all. Character counts and is open for question but I certainly would like to see more attention paid to the issues. However I also know better than to expect the media, any media, to actually do that.

How come ? you trust Obama's word for it, about his eligibility, but, you do not give O'Donnell the same benefit of the doubt.. ?

And where have I ever said I trust Obama's word on anything?

That's the very point that we ( as you would call us " Birthers " ) have been trying to make about Obama's records, but, somehow, there are some that don't want it to be a matter of " Public Record " ... even though ? the public has the right to know in the case of Obama's records...

And let me be the first to say that you Birthers are doing a bang-up job of it too.

If Occidental or Columbia or Harvard had sued Obama over unpaid tuition then that would be public record, too. Likewise, if Chase had had to foreclose on his house. If O'Donnell wants to release her school records or her birth certificate or other private information then I applaud her for it and wish Obama would do the same. But legally I can't see forcing even Obama to do so if he won't. And I don't support forcing O'Donnell to do so if she decides to keep her private information private.

101 posted on 09/26/2010 7:51:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Ok, I'll be fair and give you credit on that, however the MSM ran with that and made it into a larger monster where you had skits on SNL about it... the MSM is not innocent in that regard.

I certainly wouldn't call the media innocent on anything, but I honestly don't remember any of the MSM promoting that ludicrous 'Bristol is really the mom' story. I remember hearing about the SNL skits with Tina Fey but don't recall them ever touching on that. I did a quick check on you tube and didn't see anything.

102 posted on 09/26/2010 7:55:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Why No Probe of Barack ‘Hussein’ Obama? "

I think Conservative politicians should go in front of mics everywhere and start flushing some otf these things out:

"As I understand it, and our sad experience seems to bear it out, the President never passed his college economics course"

Force him to release his records

103 posted on 09/26/2010 8:03:39 AM PDT by cookcounty (Dec 31st is coming: .....Stop Obama's Midnight Jack-Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Please ? I appeal to you, that maybe there is a shed of light maybe somewhere deep within that the public has the right to know about their President and CIC.
Only time will tell whether he is prove to be eligible or not, but, we just don't know.
If he is eligible ? then I think most " Birthers " would be fine with that in spite of the fact that we differ so far from what he believes in.
Besides, O'Donnell is not the President of the USA.
Can't you just for a period of time step back, and put yourself in the shoes of the birthers ?
Don't you even get a hint that there is something just not right about Obama's eligibility ?
104 posted on 09/26/2010 8:06:08 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“If O’Donnell wants to release her school records or her birth certificate or other private information then I applaud her for it and wish Obama would do the same. But legally I can’t see forcing even Obama to do so if he won’t. And I don’t support forcing O’Donnell to do so if she decides to keep her private information private.”

I asked you before in the thread, how does Obama get passed the new Republican SOS’s as a presidential candidate? they have standing to request records from Hawaii DOH to confirm any abbreviated secondary documents from Obama.

Its a SOS’s legal duty to ensure candidate eligibility, if a candidate refuses to produce documents, the SOS can request a court order.

Ordinary people can’t break down Obama’s legal shields, but SOS’s can, whats your answer to that?


105 posted on 09/26/2010 8:38:38 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Wait’ll Palin announces. She hasn’t seen anything yet.”

If they haven’t found anything on her by now, they aren’t going to. Besides all the digging will just bring attention to the “non-digging” on Obama. Let them get her college records etc. this will produce demands to see his too.


106 posted on 09/26/2010 10:15:43 AM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
strange ? isn’t it ?

Strange and self-evident.

107 posted on 09/26/2010 11:07:30 AM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Now if Ted Baxter, the Weeper, Hannity and that crew would just bring it up every now and again...

Beck is purposely avoiding using the silver bullet on the Kenyan bastard. And I can't figure out why.

Beck or Rush, for that matter, should just take 15 seconds of every show to list the documents that are still missing or sealed, "Day 500", that sort of thing.

It would drive Media Matters and the other commies completely bonkers.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

108 posted on 09/26/2010 11:24:47 AM PDT by The Comedian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: imfleck
You sure do love the word “troll.”

No, I point out the trolls because of their trollish behavior.

109 posted on 09/26/2010 2:49:21 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
If they haven’t found anything on her by now, they aren’t going to.

Keep telling yourself that.

Besides all the digging will just bring attention to the “non-digging” on Obama. Let them get her college records etc. this will produce demands to see his too.

They're not that dumb. Palin's quitting will be dug into ad nauseum. Levi will be dumping dirt on the Palin's relationship. Todd's role in her Alaska administration will be made an issue. And that's just the start.

110 posted on 09/26/2010 4:05:44 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“They’re not that dumb. Palin’s quitting will be dug into ad nauseum. Levi will be dumping dirt on the Palin’s relationship. Todd’s role in her Alaska administration will be made an issue. And that’s just the start.”

And Sarah can turn round and say:

“Here is my long form Hospital Birth Certificate” when the Virginia SOS asks for it.

Whats Obama going to say?

“Ur...um...er...um.....”


111 posted on 09/26/2010 4:37:01 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Don’t forget that McCain admonished the lady that Obama was a good man and would make a good president. I couldn’t believe what I heard but it didn’t take long to collect my senses and realize the fix had been made.


112 posted on 09/26/2010 4:53:05 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It is not unusual for parties to sue for non-payment. Some of these suits can go on for years.Opinions about parties involved can be nasty but suing in the USA has become a time honored practice. Every suit has it’s own features. Been there on the ‘get’ side as a plain ordinary person.


113 posted on 09/26/2010 5:09:12 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK

So you’re suggesting she ignore the questions just like he has on ones about his birth certificate? You really think that’s going to work?


114 posted on 09/26/2010 5:57:20 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
I agree - the election was decided beforehand. Almost everyone at least on FR knew McCain had no chance. He knew it. That is why he ran.

Now Rove is bashing O'Donnell, and the MSM is in a frenzy to make the most trivial points seem terrible. MSM did this to Palin and Quayle also.

On Monday Jay Leno was mocking her for an unusually long time and then later again. He seemed so obsessed with her that it is creepy

115 posted on 09/26/2010 6:03:11 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well Sour-Kraut and Karl works for FOX, any further questions???


116 posted on 09/26/2010 8:15:42 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco

...In 1978, Krauthammer quit medical practice to direct planning in psychiatric research for the Jimmy Carter administration, and began contributing to The New Republic magazine. During the presidential campaign of 1980, Krauthammer served as a speech writer to Vice President Walter Mondale.

In January 1981, Krauthammer began his journalistic career, joining The New Republic as a writer and editor...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer


117 posted on 09/26/2010 8:18:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Palin/Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita; Red Steel

Are YOU a 1st. amendmenter???


118 posted on 09/26/2010 8:22:34 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Where are Michael Steele, Mitt Romney, Karl Rove or Charles Krauthammer on this?

Hiding behind Sarah's skirt!

119 posted on 09/26/2010 8:27:03 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Uh oh. Now you’ve done it. You’d better put the book back.


120 posted on 10/18/2010 10:35:08 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson