Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What The White House Wants To Say, But Can't (Taking on Sarah Palin directly)
The Atlantic ^ | September 17, 2010 | Marc Ambinder

Posted on 09/17/2010 1:05:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

So here's the scenario. The Democrats who craft political strategy for the party have tried to figure out how to somehow use the Tea Party moment to provide an advantage to their base. When the Tea Partiers, collectively, are in economic libertarian mode, Democrats can't make much noise.

But when Tea Partiers are in "elect someone like Christine O'Donnell mode," Democrats sense an opportunity. Simply put, the crazier the Tea Party seems, the more Democrats can link the Republican agenda to its source of energy, which in turn fires up rank-and-file Democrats.

At this point, you're probably saying... "Thank you, Captain Obvious," or something less charitable. But the background is necessary because there IS a way, a sure-fire way, to energize the Democratic base, to even pull the "professional left's" attention away from disappointment and criticism for a moment.

This tactic has been debated inside the White House, and senior advisers just aren't there yet. Trying to make John Boehner a foil for the election, or even Jim DeMint, or even Glenn Beck, is like spending half of the amount you've budgeted for a nice wool suit. Instead of Dolce and Gabbana, you wear Kenneth Cole.

There is, in fact, a much better avatar of the Tea Party movement, someone whose very name provokes disgust among Democrats, someone whose name identification is 100 percent and whose ubiquity is extremely useful.

That person is Sarah Palin.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2010; beck; bho44; congress; demint; democrats; journ0list; kneepadsfor0bama; obama; odonnell; palin; sarahpalin; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Feline nicknames! Still grasping at straws with only six weeks to go. I hope they try this, it'd be the last push needed to put her in the White House.
1 posted on 09/17/2010 1:05:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Heh heh! “The crazier the Tea Party seems”, is what gets out the vote!


2 posted on 09/17/2010 1:07:33 PM PDT by Genoa (Put the kettle on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Trying to make John Boehner a foil for the election, or even Jim DeMint, or even Glenn Beck, is like spending half of the amount you've budgeted for a nice wool suit. Instead of Dolce and Gabbana, you wear Kenneth Cole.

With such a pithy analogy, I have to say I'm shocked that Democrats are perceived as being out of touch with the common man.

3 posted on 09/17/2010 1:09:25 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Go ahead idiots, throw gasoline on a fire to try and put it out....LOL! What dolts...but that isn’t what is really funny, what is hilarious is they think they are smart, intellectual, and worldly. Bwhahahahahahahah!


4 posted on 09/17/2010 1:09:25 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (In the White House the mighty White House the Liar sleeps tonight.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When we’re in “elect someone like Christine O’Donnell mode”, that’s what happens!


5 posted on 09/17/2010 1:09:50 PM PDT by Genoa (Put the kettle on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wonder if the geniuses at Atlantic are aware that Sarah is not running for anything? Maybe they should run against Bush? What is it with progressive thinkers that they are unable to run on what they believe? They just seem totally tied to being against “someone”. Really deep thinking - really progressive. Its like the cheerleaders in high school deciding who is cool and who is not. They must be from NY.


6 posted on 09/17/2010 1:11:31 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh, pish. The MSM is the WH. This so-called strategy has been going on for what, two years now?
7 posted on 09/17/2010 1:12:13 PM PDT by workerbee (FAIL, BABY, FAIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So... I don’t get it... Is Kenneth Cole some kind of suitmaker or something?

Crap. This probably means I’m unelectable in Delaware.


8 posted on 09/17/2010 1:13:16 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So this brilliant WH thinks that running against a FOX News Channel pundit is a surefire winner?


9 posted on 09/17/2010 1:14:59 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I can’t figure out why they’re so threatened by her. She sold the governor’s jet and sent rebates to Alaskan citizens. She seems to be honest and is certainly fearless. What is their problem? How can they legitimize their egregious behavior?


10 posted on 09/17/2010 1:17:33 PM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

1) Palin was never primarily about social issues.

2) They never have stopped trying to make her an issue and she hasn’t exactly been hiding.

3) The nation knows Christine O’Donnell is not the only “Tea Party” candidate. There are several. All colorful in their own way so good luck trying to distract people from the others. LOL

4) The underestimate how committed we are to winning. I’m no more interested in fighting a battle over Palin then I was GWB when they tried that a year ago. The distraction won’t work. And if not important to us, the crazy net roots won’t be motivated. They only would be energized if we really were interested in preserving one individual.


11 posted on 09/17/2010 1:18:41 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (“I was there when we had the numbers, but didn’t have the principles.”---Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
I think we're supposed to chuckle because we're supposed to immediately "get" that Dolce and Gabbana is somehow much better than Kenneth Cole.

I think.

12 posted on 09/17/2010 1:18:47 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why can’t they say how they feel. We live in a country of FREE Speech.

Most of them are backstabbing cowards....to scared to express their convictions in public.

And all the pundits have been laughing at Palin.

This proves the point of how scared they are of her. And her power to influence.


13 posted on 09/17/2010 1:21:15 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: wideawake

I find it more intriguing they consider not blowing your whole budget is a failure somehow.


15 posted on 09/17/2010 1:23:29 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am Derek Fenton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy

The Democrats cannot make the election about policy because the people are horrified by what the democrats have done to the country.

So, all they can do is demonize the opposition in personal ways.

Shows how pathetc and negative they are.


16 posted on 09/17/2010 1:23:51 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dudes, the American electorate is sick of you. But, you go right on missing the point or glossing it over or telling yourselves that attacking Palin is the right strategy. You clueless snobs.


17 posted on 09/17/2010 1:23:58 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
They only would be energized if we really were interested in preserving one individual.

That is a really excellent observation.

The great thing about the Tea Party is that it is still spontaneous and leaderless. The Democrats have failed to pigeonhole it and effectively attack it because there is no focal point.

18 posted on 09/17/2010 1:25:29 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But when Tea Partiers are in "elect someone like Christine O'Donnell mode,"

And this is coming from the left who only 7 yrs after 9/11 - they voted for a man w/the name B.Hussein Obama who they never vetted and really didn't know him and had no problem, in the midst of others w/hand over heart and pledging allegiance - he REFUSE to do it. There is NOTHING crazier than that!
19 posted on 09/17/2010 1:26:52 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

When we’re in “elect someone like Christine O’Donnell mode”, that’s what happens!

The guy is an complete idiot. Hasn’t he been paying attention? Christine O’Donnell is no different than any of the other Tea Party candidates. Among the likes of Sharon Angle, Joe Miller, Marco Rubio, and Pat Toomey, nothing about O’Donnell’s views would stand out.

The narrative that the previous Tea Party candidates were somewhat “mainstream” but now with O’Donnell the Tea Party have really gone “extreme” is completely detached from reality.


20 posted on 09/17/2010 1:28:09 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson