Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RINOs & the dangers of Moral Equivalency
RINOList.org ^ | Aug 21, 2010 | donjuan

Posted on 08/21/2010 9:17:29 AM PDT by donjuanluis07

A RINO can be extremely dangerous when he uses Moral Equivalency to advance his political schemes, and a discerning conservative should know how to identify a RINO by his tactics. According to Websters Online Dictionary, Moral Equivalence is: “…a term used in political debate, usually to criticize any denial that a moral hierarchy can be assessed of two sides in a conflict, or in the actions or tactics of two sides. It could be considered a form of the rhetorical fallacy of equivocation.” In plain terms, when a politician uses Moral Equivalency he is attempting to equate an immoral position with an opposing position of righteousness. An example of this would be when a politician claims that a woman has a right to have an abortion because it is her body, and the fetus is not a human being. Such a position is claimed by a politician when he places his idea of law on an equal plane with the natural law of God. RINOs are tricky beasts, and being aware of the behaviors of a RINO makes it easier to spot one when you are traveling through the wilds of politics.

-Rupert


TOPICS: Issues; State and Local; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: abortion; acornpaidforthispost; assclownposter; dembot; divideandconquer; dncpropaganda; inflitraitor; liarschoir; morals; morebs; moveonorgactivist; obotposter; ridiculousloserpost; rino; sorosstooge
"Rupert" would love a comment on his page.
1 posted on 08/21/2010 9:17:31 AM PDT by donjuanluis07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: donjuanluis07
when he places his idea of law on an equal plane with the natural law of God.

The basic error of legal positivism is giving man-made law precedence and primacy over natural justice rather than the other way around.Legal positivism, which is accepted by libtards, leads to statism and despotism.

2 posted on 08/21/2010 9:37:58 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donjuanluis07

And what’s the reason a superpower like the U.S. has such difficulty against a small country stuck in the 4th century? It’s because terrorist monsters are convinced of their moral superiority, while America refuses to acknowledge our own. It’s a paradox...a segment of America is too self-righteous to admit American moral superiority. And, yes, I may be oversimplifying the complexities of Afghanistan, but there’s a hell of a lot of truth in this observation. Nice post, Rupert.


3 posted on 08/21/2010 10:55:14 AM PDT by tulloss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tulloss

Although no one has taken issue with me, I would like to clarify my skeletal response. How can we prevail when we believe that we have to handicap our military and intelligence gathering, or else we’re “no better than they are?”


4 posted on 08/22/2010 11:40:19 AM PDT by tulloss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson