You question has been repeatedly answered, with excellent, cogent, very pertinent answers, by several posters in this thread, including me. . That hasn't stopped you from dismissing every answer out of hand(with no valid reason given from you), and coming right back to demand answers to your already answered questions, and to continue trolling anyways.
“Because you are attempting to derail my simple request for answers of her POSITIVES”
Now we get to the crux of the matter don't we?
Positives on Sarah Palin in a thread that you are trolling in, are “derailing”? Since when? You are one sick puppy.
Listen, you did NOT start this thread. You don't own this thread. You came into the thread, and attempted to hijack the thread with your anti-Palin trolling.
If anyone is derailing the thread, its you.
“YOU are the one who wants to bring up negative comments about her, while I want to read good, solid information and reasons”
You may be boss in your own house, clown face. Here on FR, you are just another laughably inept troll. If you demand answers from other posters, you darn well be prepared to answer when they throw your questions right back at ya.
“So—which of us is the real troll?”
You need to be told that too?
Go through the thread again, and see who the troll is on this thread.
“Sorry, I won't fall for your silly tactic of derailing my request for positives about Palin. “
You have reportedly been given the positives. I have even supplied you with polls from the opposition poling outfit, and you still refuse to face reality and continue with your insane anti-Palin trolling anyways.
“Because they are not good or pertinent in my view. “
When everyone else thinks they are very pertinent, and the sole troll with an anti-Palinn agenda continues to insist that clearly pertinent points and facts, are not pertinent, guess who needs to go see a shrink here?
“I asked the question, and I get to decide for myself what I find satisfying.”
You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
“Sorry if my not having your low standards offends you so.”
Its truer t o say, you have ZERO standards. Your business here is to push the “Sarah Palin cannot win in 212” meme, while ridiculdimng every and any proof that Freepers bring up that proves the exact opposite of what you are pushing.
“So you keep quoting as “proof” a biased poll”
If an outfit like say, Daily Kos (which has even had to admit their polls are biased for the Democrats) publishes a poll, in which say Blanche Lincoln(D) is losing in AR US Senate race, we know for sure that Blanche Lincoln is losing big, because we know Kos has already tilted their polls for the Democrat, and Lincoln is still down even after the numbers have been cooked.
One can learn plenty even from a biased poll, depending on what party the poll is baised for, and what party they are against, and what other similar polls say.
“In other words, you're doing exactly what I said you were doing—quoting polls when they support your view, and dismissing them when they don't”
I quoted two polls. BOTH were very favorable to Sarah Palin, so which poll you babbling about again?
“Any poll that is a bad/biased poll is ALWAYS bad or biased”
If I tell ya, I added 10 points to the numbers of the Democrat in a particular poll, one can use that to deduce what the real numbers are like.
Back in January, when Daily Kos came out with polls that had Martha Coakley winning in MA, even while the other pollsters had Scott Brown winning solidly, we were able to deduce by how much Kos was cooking his numbers.
Your response: "Now we get to the crux of the matter don't we? Positives on Sarah Palin in a thread that you are trolling in, are “derailing”? Since when? You are one sick puppy."
For emphasis: "...my simple request for answers of her POSITIVES."
I was ASKING for POSITIVES about her chances--remember?
But you're so warped emotionally, so bent out of shape and determined to lie about what I actually posted--which is there for all to see--you can't even read straight--to the point where you now think that my requesting positive information about Palin makes me a sick puppy.
Look at my answers--not the lies you want them to be so you can play hero, but what I actually said.
Now look at your long assertions--not facts, just assertions of such--and your long, emotional responses.
I'll let any remaining readers of this thread determine for themselves which of us us asking for facts and reasons as to Palin's potential victory, and which of us is so emotionally-warped that he can't even read properly--let alone be rational.