If Sarah Palin wins the Presidency, then she reshapes her party to suit her preferences. And anybody who came out strongly against her will be in the doghouse for years. She is not a “with malice toward none, with charity for all” type of Republican.
Bwaahahahaha! Now who could be worried about that?
“Her strongest competition is Mitt Romney, who is strong where Palin is weak – obvious intelligence”
I could have stopped reading right there. The guy is about as perceptive as a turnip. Did he read the takedown of Mitt’s argument(ghost written by Jim Talent)concerning the START treaty? Intelligent? Why? becasue he read it somewhere.
Strike 1
“They can’t expect the gasbags to do it for them, because it’s not in their interest. Attacking Palin would be bad business for Limbaugh”
Thinks Rush is a “gasbag” Well, he thinks Romney has obvious intelligence. “Obvious” perceptual problem, Noah.
Strike 2
“But if her strategy works on her terms, then the GOP has a problem.
If that happens, the GOP will need to convince Romney to go kamikaze....Which may not be that hard... If it looks like a Palin insurgency could actually win, pressure comes down on Romney to put her away, and the new establishment favorite becomes the candidate that the Palinites can reconcile themselves to.”
Romney, go kamikake and take Palin out? This poor little dude has absolutely no idea of how a GOP primary works. And he certainly knows nothing about Mitt Romney. Romney wouldn’t go kamikaze on a bowl of jello. If ANYONE tried to go kamikaze on Palin, she would eviscerate them. The MSM has been trying to do it for two years now and it has blown up in their collective faces. But Mittens can do the job, according to this little snark.
A little more background on this guy. I saw him referred to as a conservative blogger. He loved McCain but voted for Obama. He loves Michael Bloomberg. He supported Livni, the “whack job” Labor Candidate in Israel. Some “conservative”.
http://theamericanscene.com/2008/11/04/i-do-endorsements
Strike 3
I don’t mind the fact that the guy is tendentious; or that he is so consistently wrong, even obtuse;
BUT HIS PROSE IS POSITIVELY TURGID, and I refuse to read anything he writes again. He is a very poor writer, who is nonetheless quite pleased with himself. What a guy.