Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: NucSubs
Granted, this is not from the SCOTUS, but from one of the founders. This seems very defined to me.

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in 1789

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2485624/posts

53 posted on 07/15/2010 7:11:43 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: YellowRoseofTx

Well I guess we’ll have to wait and see. My money is on the fact that natural born and naive born is a distinction without a difference and that most people and courts will see it that way as well (assuming anyone has the guts/lack of brains to bring a suit against Bobby if he runs). The press, including the conservative-friendly press and blogosphere, would have a field day with it. No one, including the courts, would want to stand in the way of a natural born citizen because of semantics.


54 posted on 07/15/2010 7:19:23 AM PDT by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson