Well since you have already excused the McCain one, I guess we really can’t have a debate.
The Carly one wasn’t great, but I’m sure you have an excuse for that one too.
So nevermind. Sarah does no wrong.
Did Limbaugh endorse Hayworth?
How do you think it would look for her to backstab the man that trusted her enough to make her his running mate on a national ticket? And I never said she “did no wrong” as you put it. I know better. There’s only been one perfect human, and He was a Rabbi and carpenter in Roman-occupied Palestine, which is quite a ways from Alaska. We need to keep an eye out for a cult of personality like the 2008 Obama campaign, but what is wrong with Carly? Isn’t she pro-life, pro-gun and pro-defense? This is 2010, not 1966, and Ronald Reagan wouldn’t have a prayer in modern-day California, sad as that is.
I take a backseat to nobody in my dislike of John McCain.
If she made a promise to him when she was his running mate then the endorsement was nothing but a promise kept, plain and simple.
I hate Carly for what she did to the venerable HP. That said; how bad do you want to see Boxer unseated? Would any of the other GOP candidates have had a snowballs chance in Hell, in Beating her?
Look, I don’t know, I’m a Midwestern boy, so I don’t have a direct dog in that hunt, but it seems to me that fielding the best GOP candidate that has a chance of beating Boxer, is better than fielding one who doesn’t right now.
We gotta take control of Congress back from the dems. That is priority one right now. Otherwise no amount of conservative wishing is going to stem the destruction of our country.
I’m with 2ID Vet.