Skip to comments.
Poll: Whitman's lead over Poizner crumbles
Sacramento Bee ^
| 5/19/10
| Jack Chang
Posted on 05/19/2010 9:37:15 PM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
05/19/2010 9:37:15 PM PDT
by
SmithL
To: ansel12
2
posted on
05/19/2010 9:38:36 PM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
3
posted on
05/19/2010 9:43:03 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: SmithL
Would Poizner be any better than Whitman...or Arnold? It seems that the CA Rs are having a RINO fest.
4
posted on
05/19/2010 9:43:27 PM PDT
by
achilles2000
(Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
To: achilles2000
We will justifiably hate Poizner, he sucks, but believe it or not, he is well to the right of Meg Whitman.
This is ugly business, but it is the way that it is.
5
posted on
05/19/2010 9:48:08 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
To: SmithL
Hilarious!
I can’t figure out which scumbag, Poizner or Whitman, to root against the hardest.
To: SmithL
7
posted on
05/19/2010 9:54:43 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
To: ansel12
believe it or not, he is well to the right of Meg WhitmanLOL!
Yeah, maybe this week he is, if anybody actually believes a word he says.
To: Lancey Howard
To give you a hint of who sucks less, Tom McClintock endorsed Steve Poizner, and Mitt Romney is Meg Whitman’s, behind the scenes guy.
9
posted on
05/19/2010 9:57:16 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
To: achilles2000
Would Poizner be any better than Whitman...or Arnold? It seems that the CA Rs are having a RINO fest.
The tell-tale sign between the two is Meg Whitman's unabashed support for tax-payer abortions, while Poizner admits he is Pro-Choice, but against tax-payer abortions and wants to work towards zero abortions in California.
One is a full-throated supporter of killing babies, the other wants to stop the practice.
If I can't trust someone to defend the most defenseless in society, I sure as hell cannot trust them to handle the financial mess in California.
Furthermore, Poizner has come out strong on border issues, while Meg says basically she has problems with AZs new Immigration law.
Illegals, and the benefits they steal from California's taxpayers are the main budgetary item causing the deficits here.
11+ billion/year
If you can't trust Whitman to deal with this problem, then you surely cannot trust her to fix the financial mess we are in.
To: ansel12
Really? Well, that settles it enough for me. If that liberal Romney thinks Whitman is that gal, she isn’t for me.
11
posted on
05/19/2010 10:00:20 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Habakkuk 2:3)
To: SoConPubbie
The main problem I have with Poizner is that he has tried to have Prop 13 repealed - that makes him a non-starter for me.
12
posted on
05/19/2010 10:01:39 PM PDT
by
JMS
To: ansel12
McClintock endorsed Poizner???
That makes no sense on the face of it. Did somebody come up with pictures?
What on earth has happened to Tom?
I figured he’d stay way clear of both of these scumbags.
To: JMS
The main problem I have with Poizner is that he has tried to have Prop 13 repealed - that makes him a non-starter for me.
Sorry, but supporting Baby Killing kind of trumps your Prop-13 issue.
Don't get me wrong, they are both less than desirable, but if I have to grit my teeth and vote for someone, it won't be somebody so callous, and yes, so evil, that they support taxpayer supported abortion.
To: Lancey Howard
If you don’t care about the election and making a choice, then why bother to do so much heavy breathing here?
15
posted on
05/19/2010 10:07:37 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
To: SoConPubbie
Having a pro-life governor will not end abortion but losing Prop 13 will totally destroy life in California if the politicians are able to tax property mercilessly. I don’t support abortion but the governor will not make the laws and Poisner is not pro-life just not pro public funds for abortion. With the economic climate the way it is even Witless and the legislature won’t be able to push public abortion funding.
16
posted on
05/19/2010 10:11:38 PM PDT
by
JMS
To: JMS
The main problem I have with Poizner is that he has tried to have Prop 13 repealed - that makes him a non-starter for me.Absolutely!
The sick scumbag Poizner wants the rat legislature to be able to raise taxes by a simple majority vote, and he wants rat-controlled municipalities to be able to raise real estate taxes as high as they want to, totally unchecked.
I am still shaking my head that McClintock endorsed him... How old is McClintock, anyway? Is he like, real old? ...Maybe getting a little wifty?
To: svcw
Whitman is a Romney girl, she first supported Romney in 1994, she worked on his campaign in 2007 and then was loaned by him to McCain for 2008.
Romney sold his Massachusetts home to move here to California to help Whitman take the Governorship, and then to use her, to catapult him to the 2012 nomination.
Romney has a lot of marbles in this basket.
18
posted on
05/19/2010 10:12:29 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
To: ansel12
If you dont care about the election and making a choice, then why bother to do so much heavy breathing here?Your rather disturbing imagination aside, I can comment on any thread I want to. And obviously I care about this election or I wouldn't be commenting here, now would I?
Are you drunk?
To: Lancey Howard
20
posted on
05/19/2010 10:22:37 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson