Thanks for posting this.
As many probably know, I have a great wish that Gov. Palin had a little bit more time in the “executive experience” category before going off on a Presidential run....
...but when I read this kind of article time and time again, and seeing that she’s just about the only one sticking up and fighting for my principals (and taking many, many unfair arrows along the way), I can only say:
RUN SARAH, RUN! 2012 CAN’T COME SOON ENOUGH!!!
I would guess she would even call direct attention to those in the Congress that were doing dirty deeds, instead of turning a blind/silent eye.
If she declares, my first check will be in the mail the following morning...
This is why she will be POTUS. She is a leader, a fighter, a general in the political arena.
All her decisions since july 3rd 2009 have been 100% successes. She has not fumbled, she has not had any gaffes, she has raised millions for the GOP, for other candidates, and her own warchest. She is building bases in places that other GOP contenders are afraid to go. Be it Eugene, Or or Boston, Mass. She takes on all comers calls out the lies for what they are, goes to war with the press, the GOP elites and the dems then changes a diaper. She always promotes her message of freedom and liberty, never backs down no matter what nasty stuff the press/dems fire back at her. She is a true believer in the message and has core beliefs.
She is the strongest leader I have seen in 30 years of watching politics and she has done it all on her own with no big names behind her, no political consultants, no spin doctors, no poll tested data.
What is the minimum amount of executive experience required for POTUS? Who has is? Romney (4 years)? Huck (6 years)? Pawlenty (8 years)? Is their quality of experience so superior to Palin's (6 years mayor, 2 as governor)? And if executive experience is a pre-requisite then congressmen or women are excluded.