Hate to be this way, and as much as I respect Quayle...he’s a non-entity today.
Too, there is no third party considered, unless it’s by miscreants. The TEA Party is a movement...not a party, and he should know that before he suggests it’s more than that.
I respect him but why should take advice from someone who didn't win the election?
//The TEA Party is a movement...not a party//
That is true, but it could become a party.
The question is then, as a party could it carry a majority of the electoral college in an election.