Posted on 03/10/2010 10:33:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Mitt Romney’s new book, No Apology, makes a very striking contrast with the most recent book entry by a potential Republican presidential candidate, Sarah Palin’s Going Rogue. Palin’s subject is Palin: her wrongs and grievances.
Unlike Palin, Romney cares about the external world. His book is an action plan, not a memoir. It is crammed with factual claims and policy recommendations, with only the lightest sprinkling of self-references. You may have already heard my theory of the two Romneys, Good Romney and Bad Romney. No Apologies is mostly written by Good Romney, but Bad Romney does make himself heard at regular intervals. This dual authorship makes it difficult to write of the book as a whole, not without invoking now-forgotten literary theories of deconstruction and unstable narration.
It’s probably simpler to go page by page …
Good Romney commences unasserted assumption: Americans live in a world defined by competition between great powers. It is the job of the American statesman to ensure that America remains paramount in this competition.
Who are the competitors?
First, the United States and its partners: Canada, Europe, and the other democratic allies, about whom Good Romney has this to say: “Sweden and several other European nations … place a far heavier governmental hand on free enterprise and on economic freedom than does the United States. Citizens are highly taxed to provide not only a very substantial social safety net but also a relatively comfortable lifestyle. Business and employment are highly regulated. Despite the differences among Western nations, economic freedom and political freedom are at the core.” (p. 13)
A refreshing departure from the representation of all non-America as a hellhole of tyranny.
Second, China. Third, Russia (?), of whom Romney has surprisingly respectful things to say. Fourth, Iran and “the jihadists.”
Of these four, only one – the West – is founded upon freedom. The outcome of this great power competition will determine the fate of human freedom in the world. That seems to me exactly right, a serious conclusion, very much in the mainstream of American conservative thinking about foreign policy. American foreign policy should seek the American interest first, with the expansion of human freedom as an expected but indirect benefit.
A couple of things to remark in passing.
On page 19, Romney inserts an inflammatory thought designed to appeal to his harder-core readers. Romney suggests that the jihadists, an uncoordinated movement, operate in many different ways to achieve different kinds of goals. Among these diverging methods: “Some endeavor to mollify and pacify the West, lulling these nations into complacency and inaction. Lebanese American scholar and NBC commentator Walid Phares argues in his book, Future Jihad, that the massive Saudi investment in Islamic study centers in Western universities is designed to do just that.”
Notice that Romney inserts this criticism of the Saudis into somebody else’s mouth. This is something of a pattern in the book: it is carefully structured to preserve disavowability at key points.
Also notice: first (of many!) favorable mention of a corporate CEO: p. 17, Jim Sens of GEN3 Partners.
Of course, David. Because Palin’s book is a book about her life, not about policy, so of course it discusses her life.
Romney’s book is about policy, so it has policy in it.
When Palin writes a book about policy, it will have policy in it as well.
People don’t buy a book about a campaign and it’s aftermath and expect it to be a position paper — unless apparently you are David Frum.
Hmm, Mr. Frum perhaps they’re different because they’re two different types of books? But, that wouldn’t occur to you because you don’t really care either way. If you were comparing Mein Kampff(sp?) to Going Rogue it wouldn’t matter to you.
I love it that he dislikes Sarah. I’d be really scared if he didn’t.
>Unlike Palin, Romney cares about the external world>
Sarah Palin’s son who is in the Army and served a Tour in Iraq (caring about America and the external world.)
While Romney sat out the Vietnam war, 2 yrs in Paris
and Romney’s 5 sons have never served in the military.
(not caring about America and the external world)
Romney = Obama second term.
This doofus has no business near the white house.
Romney is not the right choice, and his supporters need to accept that.
I cannot stand David Frum!!!!!!!!!
LOL. Go back on your meds Frum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.