[pallis]

“It will be understood she will be employing the same deceptive tactic used by many politicians by playing both ends against the middle to achieve maximum political gain if she does a 180 and endorses Hayworth. She will reveal no more courage of her convictions than any of those who seek to remain in office as long as possible. It is the reason people are demanding to clean house.”

Who would she turn around and endorse, if not Hayworth? It’s done all the time in party politics. Nothing is served, from a conservative standpoint, by demonizing Sarah for supporting McCain in this primary. Call it “stuck,” or call it whatever you want. She is being loyal, like it or not. I hope Hayworth has the good graces and good sense not to play that game.

Go Hayworth!

[Man50D]

Who would she turn around and endorse, if not Hayworth?

She should have supported the more Conservative Hayworth from the start.

It’s done all the time in party politics.

That's the reason we are in the mess we find ourselves today with a corrupt government. Palin employing the same tactic doesn't make it anymore legitimate.

Nothing is served, from a conservative standpoint, by demonizing Sarah for supporting McCain in this primary.

Nothing is served from a Conservative standpoint by supporting McAmnesty who votes with the socialist RATs much of the time.

She is being loyal, like it or not.

Party over principle is not an endearing trait. Especially when it will aid a candidate who supports many socialist issues over Conservatism.

I hope Hayworth has the good graces and good sense not to play that game.

Then you admit she is not using good sense! How is not using good sense acceptable for Palin but not Hayworth? How do you rationalize that contradiction in your mind?