[rabscuttle385]

Demanding perfect purity in Politics is a sure prescription for political irrelevance. This is why the Libertarian wing of the Conservative movement has been so completely ineffective for the last 20 years. This is why you people always lose to the RINOS. They all keep wasting all their time making the perfect the enemy of the good. They are so busying spending all their time worrying about the dogmatic purity in their political allies they never have any time, or energy left to fight the Leftists on anything.

Um, in case you haven't noticed, I'm supporting J.D. Hayworth, a man with whom I do have disagreement, based on his record in Congress.

Yet you once again break out your tired accusations of my being a "purist."

Fool.

Have you even read my posts lately?

I want McCain gone, so we don't end up with 2+ years of an unholy Graham-McCain-Obama trifecta fragging conservatives at every opportunity.

If Hayworth doesn't win the Arizona primary, then conservative Arizonans (or should I say, residents of Aztlan, should McCain have his way) might as well vote for the Democrat in the general election, since either way, a liberal Democrat is going to win, barring a strong third-party challenge (highly unlikely).

[chickadee]

I know what you mean. I am tired of being told that we must vote for sellouts like McCain because they have an R behind their names. In Wisconsin, they are babbling about running Tommy Thompson. The conservative talk show hosts all talk about Thompson being a “reliable” vote. That’s just it - when it comes to quislings like McCain, Snowe, Collins, Graham, and the ever popular weathervane, Arlen Specter, they are not reliable conservative votes. They are the reason the Republican Party and the nation is in trouble.

[CAluvdubya]

Have you even read my posts lately?

Ad nauseum.

[rintense]

How is you supporting JD, with whom you have disagreements, any different than Sarah stumping for McCain? It isn’t.