Posted on 01/06/2010 9:45:33 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Mit is not a bad guy, I worked to help to get him nominated and elected. He sucked when he won, he is just like his Father a rat by another name.
Unfortunately that’s probably the case because you weren’t a constituent and GOP member in MA when he was governor there. He got me energized about the local party again—and then let everyone down.
He was against, but now he is for, Ronald Reagan.
Mitt's book is #1,783 on amazon.com’s best seller list. I don't think you'll have to camp out overnight to meet Mitt on his book tour.
Did you see the cover of his book?.....I WILL buy a book and support conservative efforts. Anything to jab the left!!! Its not a vote for President its a BOOK>
What experience? Best impersonation of a sail?
This country needs a businessman in the WH to work with business and help the economy.
As opposed to an excellent communicator, leader, and child?
LOL! Good one!
By that logic, Warren Buffet, Donald Trump, Steve Wynn, Lee Iacoca, and ten thousand other successful businessmen are worthy presidential material.
Citizen taxpayers are not employees and the U.S. government is not a business; it should not be in the business of being a business.
An exec businessman like Romney does what he does by negotiating and strategic manipulation of resources, including the human resource of employees, in order to make the business function more efficiently and hence more profitably. The goal is to achieve the highest output/profit with the least costly use of resources in order to benefit the business.
Think long and hard before you wish for "leaner" "more efficient" government, because all it really means is that that government will aim for achieving the same or more regulation, repression and taxation using fewer resources to accomplish it. A businessman will tell you true that a leaner business is in no way connected to less business. American doesn't need leaner government, it needs less government.
While one of the skills of a leader is to negotiate, negotiating is entirely separate from leading. Romney, with his businessman's model, is all too eager to negotiate for Republicans on Democrat terms. THAT is not leading; that is sacrificing conservative principle on the altar of business-minded "pragmatism."
Romney has stated that he believes "moderate" politicians from both sides of the aisle are what America needs for "leadership." I think a pretty good argument can be made that the concept of "moderate leadership" is an oxymoron.
Enslavement awaits those who support applying a business model to government. Businesses are the engines of our creative energy and productivity and belong in an environment of freedom and self-determination. Government is our servant and belongs in the servants' quarters.
Words fail me.
I will give you credit for swimming upstream at this post. You are not a conformist.
While I now have serious reservations about Romney(TARP1 and Romney-care) , I will admit he is one of best communicators and debaters I have seen in a long time. It seems like most freepers dont understand how critical that is. It should be obvious after GWB.
LOL. God bless, GWB.
You are correct. I’m not a conformist. I can actually think and decide for myself what I think is best. If I am wrong, I eventually get it. ;-)
And you are correct, communication is very important, especially when it comes to our politicians. Without that, people can’t have as much trust and faith in the person or feel part of the process.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.