Given the choice, I’d like to ban the aforementioned, as none of them are Conservatives. Rudy, Huck, Romney, and McLAME are RINO’s of the Worst Order..
Ron Paul, However is a different case.. as I’ve yet to figure out Which PLANET he is FROM.
That would be planet "Domestic Constitution, Foreign Fairyland".
I like Paul’s fiscal/domestic leanings, for the most part. It’s his forign policy on which I disagree.
What I find truly discouraging is that even wiith the Rupblican control of both the Execuitive and Legislative branches there was not a push to illegalize abortion; the Mexico City stance was good for being something that could be dine soly on the Presidentt’s initiave.
Then there was the TRUELY discouraging lost oppertunity of post-9/11 wherein the administration basically endorsed a “do nothing”/”get back to your normal life” stance which the people took maybe a bit too much to heart; it would have been better, IMO, to blow off the dust regarding militias and have taken the overflow from the surge of recuits/volenteers from the surge in enlistments there... especially when the help of retired or recovering veterans could have been used in reconstructing the [states’]militias. (It is, in my experience, a good thing to have something to do.)
{Also, I realize that many states recognize their national guard as their _ORGANIZED_ milita.}