Skip to comments.
Porn star Stormy Daniels challenges shamed Republican in Senate race (LA)
The London Times ^
| May 8, 2009
| Tim Reid
Posted on 05/08/2009 8:23:21 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Norman Bates; Impy; ExTexasRedhead; MplsSteve
David Vitter has given his opponents a free platform to run on.
2
posted on
05/08/2009 8:24:39 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
To: Clintonfatigued
Vitter deserves to lose for visitng prostitutes, but does a prostitute herself deserve to win?
3
posted on
05/08/2009 8:28:16 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(physically unabel to proofreed (<---oops))
To: Mr. K
Secretary of State Jay Dardenne is thinking of challenging Vitter in the Republican primary.
4
posted on
05/08/2009 8:29:52 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
To: Clintonfatigued
Well, ya, you can’t call her a hypocrite. Because someone with no values will ever fall short of their values.
How many people would vote for a pornography star? It’s not exactly the best experience to be in Washington doing the important work of government. This is good for wisecracks on comedy and satire shows, but will she really get significant support?
To: Clintonfatigued
It’s hypocritical for this former Porn Star to say “My past sexual contact doesn’t matter in this race..but Senator Vitter’s 1 One infadelity does”, easily defeated!
6
posted on
05/08/2009 8:32:44 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
To: Dilbert San Diego
How many people would vote for a pornography star? Washington is already full of whores, one porn star won't make much difference. She probably has higher moral standards than a typical Kennedy.
7
posted on
05/08/2009 8:35:25 PM PDT
by
Prokopton
To: Mr. K
Vitter deserves to lose I'd let her beat me.
8
posted on
05/08/2009 8:36:12 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(A feral conservative in my own land.)
To: Prokopton
Washington is already full of whores, one porn star won't make much difference.
In fact, it could be reasonably argued that her morals are a better example than most congresscritters' because (a) she didn't hide what she did and (b) she wasn't trying to f*** the taxpayers.
To: llevrok
“I’d let her beat me.”
Dude, have you heard about the swine flu...really...
10
posted on
05/08/2009 8:40:41 PM PDT
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Country and the Tea Party! Take America Back!)
To: Phileleutherus Franciscus
“she wasn’t trying to f*** the taxpayers.”
actually...
11
posted on
05/08/2009 8:41:35 PM PDT
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Country and the Tea Party! Take America Back!)
To: Phileleutherus Franciscus
Here’s my logic. Vote her in and put next to Sen Al Franken. The senate has become a comedy of errors...so lets just go all the way. In fact...after watching some of these guys in interviews...without much knowledge of anything...she might be a breathe of fresh air. Finally, they’d have to put her onto some committees...and we might actually get real questions asked.
To: Mr. K
...congress is full of whores already, you want to judge her for her occupation???
13
posted on
05/08/2009 8:43:43 PM PDT
by
gargoyle
(...66.7% , A good round number...)
To: Prokopton
...sorry, posted the same response, I’m with yer..
14
posted on
05/08/2009 8:45:38 PM PDT
by
gargoyle
(...66.7% , A good round number...)
To: Clintonfatigued
she’s going to “blow” the competition.
15
posted on
05/08/2009 8:48:27 PM PDT
by
MAD-AS-HELL
(Hope and Change. Rhetoric embraced by the Insane - Obama, The Chump in Charge)
To: Clintonfatigued
her decision to thrust her 36-inch chest into Louisiana politicsAh those wacky English newspapers!
16
posted on
05/08/2009 8:48:38 PM PDT
by
John123
(The US may be going down the drain, but everyone else will drown first...)
To: SeattleBruce
...Just the tax collectors, and they should be screwed, out of office...
17
posted on
05/08/2009 8:49:26 PM PDT
by
gargoyle
(...66.7% , A good round number...)
To: llevrok
18
posted on
05/08/2009 8:55:25 PM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
(Today's politicians, living proof why we have and need a second amendment to the constitution.)
To: Mr. K
why should vitter loose just for visiting a prostitute?????
Ted Kennedy was responsible for driving a car that took the life of a young lady, and he continues to serve...
Robert Byrd was an active member of the KKK, he still serves or sleeps which ever...
and many many more have ‘sins’ on them selves in Congress and they serve, I'm not going to fault Mr. Vitter, seems his marriage has survived...there are many more important thing to be concerned about...
To: JSDude1
Its hypocritical for this former Porn Star to say My past sexual contact doesnt matter in this race..but Senator Vitters 1 One infadelity does, easily defeated! Exactly.
20
posted on
05/08/2009 8:58:15 PM PDT
by
Sister_T
(The Obama Administration = EPIC FAIL!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson