Check this out!
Matthews is right. Huckster is getting a free ride because the media wants him either nominated or on a ticket with Rudy. As for Scarborough, whose IQ has dropped a point every day since he became a media whore, Fox News is nothing but the Rudy News Network.
[MATTHEWS: Yeah, it was drafted because we were fighting the British. I hate to tell you, that the United States government is our government now. Conditions have changed.]
The conditions that have changed is that instead of the lobsterbacks with musketry we are now fighting home-invaders, carjackers, street gangs armed with machine-pistols and psychotics on shooting sprees in schools and malls, etc.
Is he worthy of being taken as a serious analyst?
Place this under the
category of the unhinged left.
Yeah, it was drafted because we were fighting the British. I hate to tell you, that the United States government is our government now. Conditions have changed.
That the 'fight' with the 'redcoats' was long over and the 2A was drafted as part of the USA code, this is very moronic or pure EVIL agenda.
yeah times have changed, now we fight the plain ol 'reds'...
Matthews encapsulates very well how liberal statists view the RKBA.
God help us if Hillary wins.
Matthews derided as “black helicopter stuff,” the former Arkansas governor’s assertion that owning a gun gives Americans the ability to fight tyranny. “It sounds crazy,” he told “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough.
“Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible”
Senator Hubert H. Humphrey (D) Minn.
“Know Your Lawmakers” Guns (magazine), February, 1960, p. 4.
No, it's not. Well, maybe for stupid people like Matthews, but in general, no.
Chris Matthews? Are you sure this isn’t Chris Wallace? Am having a hard time telling the difference anymore.