To: Waryone
OKay, hang on just a second here. Fred Thompson answers a question about global warmimng by saying man may be responsible "in part", and following that up with "there's a lot we don't know", and then stressing that other countries will have to do a lot more before we do anything with regard to global warmimng, and you somehow garner from that that Thompson is a RINO who will throw open the borders and sell our sovereignty to the highest bidder? That's the sort of stretch that would make Reed Richards jealous. I'm surprised it wasn't painful, actually.
22 posted on
09/19/2007 1:59:16 PM PDT by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: Jokelahoma
Not for the loyal opposition, under the stress of certain doom...
24 posted on
09/19/2007 2:00:56 PM PDT by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Jokelahoma
People don’t understand that although the following response might give the Donutters and Paulistas a hard-on, most people won’t go for:
“Global warming is bullsh*t and anyone who disagrees is a moron.”
26 posted on
09/19/2007 2:02:17 PM PDT by
RockinRight
(Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
To: Jokelahoma
You might want to pay attention to the post I was replying to.
62 posted on
09/19/2007 4:47:38 PM PDT by
Waryone
(Constantly amazed by society's downhill slide.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson