[dirtboy]

FWIW, I do think the serial spamming and trashing are a waste of bandwidth and really only serve to inflame.

As opposed to the Rudy boosters ripping Reagan's legacy?

Or belittling pro-life groups as not wanting Roe v. Wade overturned, lest the donations stop?

Or claiming that those opposed to Rudy are against the military?

I've seen all that. If anything, the Romney supporters are much better. They (and he) at least realize they have to bridge the entire party. The Rudy boosters seen to think they can tell the right wing to go pound sand and that core right-wing values are a hinderance to winning the White House.

And that, quite frankly, is why you see this kind of response. I was not as driven against Rudy until I saw the hammers coming out against Reagan's legacy.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>As opposed to the Rudy boosters ripping Reagan's legacy?

Its a small price to pay, if it means raising Rudy`s visability with FReepers/Lurkers. Isn't one of the Rudy-Rooters slogans, "win at all costs". Its insane. Most Republicans are conservative. These attacks on everything conservative, is the antithesis of what FR is all about.

[onyx]

From everything I have read, Rudy would make a good CIC, but like I have previously posted, I do NOT have a candidate at this point.

I do know from the threads I've seen, that no one backer of one candidate has clean hands when it comes to bashing other candidates.

Every poster seem to have one that they "just won't vote for" --- well, how great is that? Say hello to President Democrat with that thinking.

I will vote for and support the GOP nominee regardless.