Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
"So Bush is much better than Nixon, and the party is much more conservative, and you still are unappeasable!

By the standard I measure them against, Ronald Reagan, they are truly lacking. Nixon had a hostile House and Senate, Bush had republican House and Senate for the last 6 years and didn't get it done. The public just didn't see any point of giving him another two, kind of like hitting the reset button.

165 posted on 11/09/2006 2:37:27 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law
Bush had republican House and Senate for the last 6 years

For most of the first 2 years the Senate was Democrat. For the next 2 years there was a 1 Senator majority, so even 1 RINO could stop anything! There has only been a more than 1 seat majority for 20 months, and even then you need 60 votes to pass partisan measures in the Senate!

We haven;t had a majority control as great as we just lost since Eisenhower's 1st 2 years. We haven't had the 60 vote margin since the 1920's -- that's 80 YEARS !! I don't know about you, but I don't expect to be too politically active when I'm 145 years old!!!!

166 posted on 11/09/2006 2:48:51 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson