To: fieldmarshaldj
I was a skeptic until doing some reading. Now I think they have a strong argument. Maybe not a winner--but a strong argument nonetheless.
Complaint
Points and Authorities
9 posted on
10/22/2006 5:18:53 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: calcowgirl
It actually reads to me that, if the cases they cite say what they claim they do,that this is an activist court problem. The plain language of the statute merely says that he must have been qualified for the past 5 years. It doesn't say anything about being "active" or "inactive". At worst, all an "inactive" attorney would have to do is reactivate his membership (that's basically paying dues, no?)to be qualified. It seems to me that if anybody has a problem here, it's the courts.
To: calcowgirl
The question is, if Brown is disqualified, do the 'Rats then get to choose a replacement (i.e. second-place finisher Rocky Delgadillo) ?
12 posted on
10/22/2006 5:35:35 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: calcowgirl
I just got an e-mail from the California Republican Lawyers Association telling me that they have joined the lawsuit. Also, if you go to
http://www.politicalvanguard.com
it says that the Attorney General has joined the lawsuit, as well as the Secretary of State.
There is also a new article there called "Why The 1980 Attorney General's Opinion Does Not Help Jerry". It explains more, but I don't know how to post it. Maybe somebody else can post it for me?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson