"The Civil War you should be looking for is not going to be fought with guns. The democrats will see to that when they totally ban guns from law-abiding citizens."
First of all, and although we still have a long way to go (as far as eliminating certain unconstitutional gun laws currently on the books), we're winning the gun fight at this moment -- the AWB just faded into the sunset and we're winning the CCW state battles in a big way. (Check out this 15 year map). In addition, most Democrats (since the 2000 election) have convinced themselves that gun-grabbing is a losing issue for them. So the chance of a total gun ban in the foreseeable future is extremely remote.
Secondly, I strongly suspect that most "law-abiding citizen" gun owners would tell the Feds where they can stick such a gun ban if it ever does come to pass. Civil disobedience would be the rule, not the exception. .....as well it should.
So this Civil War could be fought will guns, but for now it's going to be fought in the manner you desribed.
"The Civil War you should be looking for is not going to be fought with guns. The democrats will see to that when they totally ban guns from law-abiding citizens."
"I strongly suspect that most "law-abiding citizen" gun owners would tell the Feds where they can stick such a gun ban if it ever does come to pass. Civil disobedience would be the rule, not the exception. .....as well it should.
Civil War could be fought will guns, but for now it's going to be fought in the manner you desribed."
I DO see CWII fought with actual guns. A UN/International police force within the US would expedite that process mightily.
Remember, Kerry and the Democrats have exposed themselves as internationalists first and foremost.