The more I think about this position, the more consistently the arrogant attitude of a socialist aristocracy fully explains nearly all of their behavior.
This is a point, I admit, I really haven't considered until now. I have instinctively opposed many of their individual and perspectives in the past, but I hadn't really placed them into context.
Consider how Kerry patronized the woman who asked about partial birth abortion and stem cell research during the recent debate. Kerry's method simply treats her as something akin to how he would treat a dog and its feelings. He states he respects her appeal to morality in the same way he would empathize with a labrador retriever staring at him into his eyes.
There is no sincere identification of his fellow man as his equal, merely an actor's response in the face of a democratic power structure, where until he and other socialists can figure out and implement full control of voter fraud to seal the elections he must recognize the public perception of his persona impacts future powers being made available to him.
It explains why he really doesn't care about voting in the Senate except for maybe 5-10% of the votes. It is manifest in the character of his present wife, who nonchalantly remarked children hurricane victims should just go naked for a few days,...completely clueless to reality but self-absorbed in their aristocracy.
It is manifest in his belief that by publically declaring the 'rich' must pay more taxes, however, he and the wealth he married into still pay less tax percentages than most of the 'poor'.
It is manifest in how he has already been granted authority by the UN to go after Pol Pot, so as to show the word it will not tolerate another genocidal dictator,..but for a decade has been unable to bring the rials to fruition,....has never sought to build a coalition amongst nations in such a unanimously obvious supportable international political position,...but has no qualms in accusing Bush of rushing to judgment when the same UN body fails for over a decade to enforce its own mandates upon Saddam Hussein.
Kerry is simply meglamaniacal in his socialistic aristocratical perspective. The only plans Kerry has are to advance himself.
pretty hard to treat terrorists as nuisances when 011 happened. But if you think terrorist activity is going to be eradicated , you may be mistaken. I think this war will go on a long time and we won't really get comfortable for a generation. Then there will still be things that happen from time to time. You can call them sporadic attacks or "nuisance attacks",,the vocabulary is Kerry's problem. I think he has the concept. And we can spin it however for political purposes but I still think he was saying pretty much what alot of people think.