Skip to comments.
AMERICONSERVATIVE ENDORSES PEROUTKA CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT
AmeriConservative ^
| Feb. 7, 2004
| Dennis Durband
Posted on 02/08/2004 7:35:02 PM PST by repentant_pundit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Go, Michael !
To: repentant_pundit
LOL
Michael!!!! will be lucky to match the 0.09% of the vote that Howard Phillips got in 2000.
2
posted on
02/09/2004 3:55:27 AM PST
by
Impy
(Are dogcatchers really elected?)
To: repentant_pundit
I tried it in flowery language. I tried it in campaign speak. I even tried it a "little edgy". It just didn't make it.
Ralph Nader will not be on the ballot this year. I think if he tried, the Democrats would have prevented him. They are petitioning the heavens to realign the stars. They are not leaving anything to chance.
This is reality, the ends ALWAYS justify the means. Petty fiefdoms of platitudes and vanity masquerading as principle, will only deliver this great nation to a president and a party whose only complaint with the deficit is they weren't the one's who ran it up. It's not much fun watching somebody else dally with a prostitute.
With discipline there can be victory. With solidarity there can be victory. So if need be, close your eyes and think of the national defense!
To: olde north church
National defense? Has someopne in our republican controlled congress proposed dispanding our armed services? Last I checked funding is way up ... to the tune of 7% for 2005 (10% for homeland defense).
To: repentant_pundit

Constitution Party Bump!
5
posted on
02/09/2004 11:47:30 AM PST
by
jgrubbs
(ForOurFuture; Ricardo4CP; The_Eaglet; Kwilliams)
To: KFriedConserv
I support Republicans and a strong defense, more than you know. These petty folks want to out-conservative each other and just want to suck votes away from Bush, it's absolutely ridiculous. The last time these little, tin-pots were suffered through 8 years of Clinton.
To: olde north church
You are , of course, correct. The 'purists' are just silly. We face serious foreign,military problems. Kerry is a empty suit as to leadership. He is a pacifist socialist , yet, he can draw at least 45% of the voters since those voters hate Bush, the GOP, Christians, and conservatives in general. If the right extremists want a lefty sitting in the WH , they will go and pout and waste their votes. We need all libertarians, conservatives of any and all stripes to vote for Bush and GOP reps. Why? Because the option of having lefty loon Dems in charge of our foreign policy and military is scarier than any deficit, over-spending option. Bush is our ONLY WAR PRESIDENT. NO LEFTY NOR CAN ANY SMALL GROUP OF ANTIS CALLING THEMSELVES CONSERVATIVES CAN BE ELECTED OR LEAD US. STICK WITH BUSH AND THE GOP.
To: repentant_pundit
You must be kidding
8
posted on
02/10/2004 6:00:08 AM PST
by
garylmoore
(It is as it was)
To: olde north church
Nader is still thinking abour running as an independent. Foolish move on his part, he'd get move votes as a green.
9
posted on
02/10/2004 6:41:58 AM PST
by
Impy
(Are dogcatchers really elected?)
To: ForOurFuture; Ricardo4CP; The_Eaglet; Kwilliams
I put you in my Tagline instead of the To: field.
10
posted on
02/10/2004 7:59:24 AM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: jgrubbs
Thanks for the flag, jgrubbs!
11
posted on
02/10/2004 8:23:13 AM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Opportunity: http://www.peroutka2004.com)
To: garylmoore
No, I must not be kidding. If you have a point to make, please be specific. This forum is for people who express ideas clearly. Thanks.
12
posted on
02/10/2004 11:10:49 AM PST
by
repentant_pundit
(For the Sons and Daughters of Every Planet on the Earth)
To: repentant_pundit
They have the opportunity to vote for a genuine conservative who will not compromise on principle I am greatful to Michael Peroutka and the Constitution Party for providing this opportunity.
13
posted on
02/12/2004 3:24:30 AM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Opportunity: http://www.peroutka2004.com)
spelling correction:
grateful
To: Impy; jgrubbs
I believe he will do much better than that as his campaign is much more active than Phillips was in 2000, and the true colors of the Republican incumbent have been revealed by his performance on various issues such as border defense, deficit spending, abortion spending, and freedom of speech with campaign finance reform.
15
posted on
02/12/2004 2:05:04 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: olde north church
These petty folks want to out-conservative each other and just want to suck votes away from Bush, it's absolutely ridiculous Bush needs to be held accountable for his usurpations on the Constitution and liberal spending which he has signed and implemented.
Rewarding illegal immigrants with legal status isn't exactly defending our borders.
16
posted on
02/12/2004 2:18:52 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: phillyfanatic; jgrubbs; TBP; Theodore R.
STICK WITH BUSH AND THE GOP. Bush and the liberal Republicans would need to stick with the Constitution before getting my support. He has repeatedly proven that we can not trust him to be faithful to his oath of office.
17
posted on
02/12/2004 2:22:40 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: The_Eaglet
Here are four choices:
1 Vote Bush and press for reform
2 Vote Dem then grumble, unless you're a dem, there is no way in Heaven
your agenda will be addressed.
3 Vote 3rd party as a protest, see 2 above
4 Don't vote, see 2 above
MTF
18
posted on
02/12/2004 2:29:39 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Is it treason to oppose tyranny, I say never! P. Henry/me too! O.N.C.)
To: olde north church; DustyMoment; repentant_pundit; Cindy
Vote Bush and press for reform I haven't been impressed with Bush's application of "reform" in laws like "bi-partisan campaign finance reform" which inhibit free speech, or "immigration reform" where illegal immigrants are rewarded for their lawbreaking. The spending incresaes and expansion programs aren't exactly the "reform" I was looking for, either.
19
posted on
02/12/2004 2:45:22 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: jgrubbs; ETERNAL WARMING
20
posted on
02/12/2004 3:04:26 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson